oblige to use layers when designing with Fireworks ?
Hey
when i design with fireworks, and then i export it as a html page. But when i open it with dreamweaver, it all comme as a block of tables. As tables cannot be put one on another, layers are the only solution I THINK ?, the BIG problem is that when u put a layer on a page, and when i preview it on the IE browser, the layers aren't the same place they were in dreamweaaver. They change completly the position, so it all become MESSY. Please tell me what to do!,
Thanx again,
Brian
nothing to say
Busy posted this at 00:21 — 25th June 2001.
He has: 6,151 posts
Joined: May 2001
finish your page in whatever you start it in.
fireworks or dreamweaver, not both
The way I see it is you have two options, make it work with tables or use flash
Best advice = make it work with tables, flash is becoming the next 'animated gif, blinking text, marquee ..' of the net.
layers arent supported by all browsers equally, even the main two (IE and NS) use different tags - hide, hidden, show, visible.
there is no way to get it to work on all browsers, all versions so your cutting a chunk of your market off unless you make at least 3 or 4 versions - IE, NS, Mac, others.
when previewing it, what you see in IE 5 is pretty much what you'll get in NS 6, but NS4.7 is a totally different story.
Good Luck
Megan posted this at 01:25 — 25th June 2001.
She has: 11,421 posts
Joined: Jun 1999
I disagree about Flash - it can be a very good tool when used well and for the right reasons.
Anyway, it sounds like you don't really know too much about HTML. I would suggest that if this the case that yo go out and and learn it. The HTML generation tools in Fireworks etc. and even Dreamweaver can be a problem if you don't know what the HTML behind it is doing.
I'm not exactly sure what you're talking about here (if you could give us a URL or a screenshot that would probably be helpful). What people do most of the time is create .gif graphics that look like several differnet elements layered on top of one anotehr when they're really not.
Tables do tend to be easier to work with - at least they are when you know the HTML. Layers can be a little bit unpredictable sometimes.
Megan
Connect with us on Facebook!
notyourproblem posted this at 13:53 — 25th June 2001.
They have: 3 posts
Joined: Jun 2001
what do ya mean work with dreamweaver or fireworks .Both works together. I'm obliged to import the webdesign from te fireworks to dreameaver. In fireworks, i can't put the contents (text,.....), because it will all be saved as graphics. About layers and tables, my question was "i'm i oblige to use layers when designing a website with fireworks then importing it in dreamweaver" , not "is layers easier and better to use than layers" ,
overwise, thanx for your reply!,
Brian
nothing to say
Megan posted this at 14:03 — 25th June 2001.
She has: 11,421 posts
Joined: Jun 1999
Okay, I think I'm understanding you a little better.
No, you're not obliged to work with layers, in fact, it's probably better to stick with the tables it generates. THe thing is that Fireworks doesn't know what you want to be a graphic and what you want to make into plain text, so it just makes everything into graphics. You just have to slice it up so that any areas that will contain text are separated from the areas that will be graphics. Then once you get into Dreamweaver you can delete the blank graphics where your text will be.
Megan
Connect with us on Facebook!
Want to join the discussion? Create an account or log in if you already have one. Joining is fast, free and painless! We’ll even whisk you back here when you’ve finished.