The OP is asking the

ablaye — Thu, 12 Feb 2015 18:16:44 +0000

The OP is asking the differences between "www." and "http://www.". They are the same. The 'http' is the protocol used and you'll end up with "http://www." even if you type "www.".
That said, he probably meant "http://domain.com" vs "http://www.domain.com". It is a matter of preference which one you want to use. Most websites should the "http://www.domain.com" and this is what people are familiar with the most.

Generally people used to

sriibalaji26 — Sat, 10 Jan 2015 05:04:56 +0000

Generally people used to redirect www. to http://www. since is the default version suggested by Google. It is only important on how you use it. If you are already using it without www. then just go ahead. If it is a new website, just make a 301 redirection along with http:// and use it by default!!

The issue is whether you want

samauden — Fri, 19 Dec 2014 11:06:21 +0000

The issue is whether you want the website to be opened with www or without leading www. If any website opens in two modes i.e with [strong]domainname.com[/strong] and [strong]www.domainname.com[/strong]. Then it is canonical issue that needs to be resolved. Otherwise Google sees them as identical websites or copy sites with duplicate content. There is a chance that Google might make the site spam. One can choose to open the website in either of one and redirect to another format by writing 301 redirect in server's ht access file to fix the canonical issue.

To google it does not matter.

valhar — Mon, 20 Oct 2014 07:55:08 +0000

To google it does not matter. It is only important once you decide on any of the tips is to hold it. That is to link only with the address with www, if you have set modrewrite with www. Or the same oposite situation, if in modrewrite you have only http, dont link to your website with www.

michelterry wrote:Hi, I would

stellaex — Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:46:02 +0000

michelterry wrote:

Hi,
I would like to know that which one option is best one in concern of ranking for organic search result with Google.com
1. WWW
or
2. http://www
Please share with me you opinion as soon as possible.

Well, to be honest there is no such different between http://www and www.
It could be discussed if the question is about www and non-www. Although, that is just a technical aspect of your hosting and got nothing to do with search rankings. But they can effect if you have implemented in a wrong way or other than search guidelines.

Thanks.

either of the two is fine,

JakeSmithOZ — Thu, 20 Oct 2011 06:27:21 +0000

either of the two is fine, though i always prefer using with "www" and if my domain name is really long i drop the "www" , your site success would depend on your marketing campaigns and your strategy

If Google can see both, you

technologynow — Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:47:35 +0000

If Google can see both, you need to change things so that it only sees one (either one).

That's because, as said above, Google sees these as two different sites, but with identical content.

Google likes unique content, not content copied from other sites, so if it sees both it penalises you. If it only sees one, it like you.

Google tells us another

crasohea — Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:30:32 +0000

Google tells us another story: For Google quote `http://xxx.com' and `http://www.xxx.com' are two entirely different domains regarding the links.

I prefer the http version as

Jasjotbains — Fri, 29 Jul 2011 06:06:07 +0000

I prefer the http version as most of my links earlier were http based,and it is easy to track my backlinks in Webmaster tools

with www or without www can

keyideas — Wed, 13 Jul 2011 06:14:57 +0000

with www or without www can be canonical issue in a single so to solve this issue it is advisable to use only one. i prefer with www is the best one