<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1046643" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1046643</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
          <item>
    <title>Right there with you -</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-database-development/alternative-ms-sql-server-2005-express-edition#comment-1250894</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Right there with you - Software limitations are a joke (mostly).  The DB size is probably limited to 4GB because they figure that companies that need more space have deeper pockets.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 01:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>pr0gr4mm3r</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1250894 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The obvious answer is to use</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-database-development/alternative-ms-sql-server-2005-express-edition#comment-1250824</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;The obvious answer is to use a Free software RDBMS, &lt;em&gt;but&lt;/em&gt; only you know whether this is feasible, based on how much engineering effort it will take to migrate. SQL tables and data should be relatively easy to migrate (since they&#039;re based on the SQL Standard) but things like stored procedures, triggers and such might be harder.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The two best alternatives are: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mysql.com&quot;&gt;MySQL&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.postgresql.org/&quot;&gt;PostgreSQL&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The long-term answer is not to use products that lock you into one vendor and/or have stupid, artificial restrictions on how much they will do before trying to screw money out of you. I&#039;m mystified why any company on a budget would pick Microsoft products for Web hosting, unless you &lt;em&gt;really need&lt;/em&gt; some feature(s) they provide, if that&#039;s the case why are you on here asking for alternatives?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;/me *scratches head*&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I honestly don&#039;t get it. &lt;img src=&quot;https://www.webmaster-forums.net/misc/smileys/confused.png&quot; title=&quot;Confused&quot; alt=&quot;Confused&quot; class=&quot;smiley-content&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 01:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>JeevesBond</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1250824 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Hi pollard,
In a way they are</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-database-development/alternative-ms-sql-server-2005-express-edition#comment-1250807</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Hi pollard,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a way they are correct but for me it is more of a sales pitch for microsoft. You can ask them if a unix based sql server is compatible with your database. I prefer using a unix base when it comes to server side. not that they are secure but they are also stable compared to their Microsoft counterparts. If you have a good sql server admin then it would be easy for them to manage it.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 13:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jabulani</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1250807 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
