<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1044719" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1044719</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
          <item>
    <title>If you&#039;re happy with</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/static-versus-dynamic-cms-produced-sites#comment-1244397</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;If you&#039;re happy with Dreamweaver and it does what your clients need, then feel free to continue using it!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think Megan&#039;s blog post was meant to get people thinking, rather than force an idea down their throats.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>JeevesBond</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1244397 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Ermmmm yeah it was your blog</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/static-versus-dynamic-cms-produced-sites#comment-1244386</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Ermmmm yeah it was your blog posting I saw.&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the clarification&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jayesser</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1244386 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>I wrote a blog post about</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/static-versus-dynamic-cms-produced-sites#comment-1244381</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I wrote a &lt;a href=&quot;http://meganmcdermott.com/2009/03/09/dreamweaver-dying/&quot;&gt;blog post&lt;/a&gt; about this actually. As I said in the comments there, it’s getting increasingly rare to find a website that doesn’t require a) editing by regular people or b) advanced functionality that is better provided by an out-of-the-box system rather than being developed from scratch. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(For me it&#039;s not really a &quot;fact&quot; that static web pages will become obsolute - more of an interseting proposition to consider. There are CMS&#039;s that push out static html pages to web servers as well)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is it &quot;okay&quot; to continue to use Dreamweaver? Sure, as long as you continue to find that it meets the needs of your clients (given the above two points).&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1244381 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
