<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1044280" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1044280</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
          <item>
    <title>I wish I can achieve this</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/please-critique-my-website-lovely-print#comment-1243357</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I wish I can achieve this level of clean look to my site.  I really like site that are not loaded with colors.  The cleaner and emptier, the better for me.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>RTFVerterra</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1243357 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>I&#039;ll second the last two</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/please-critique-my-website-lovely-print#comment-1243214</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I&#039;ll second the last two opinions, but there&#039;s not a lot here to critique. I think the most important part of your site will be what you use for content. The copy you have so far talks about &quot;we&quot; too much, in my opinion. I prefer to read about &quot;me&quot; and why &lt;strong&gt;I&lt;/strong&gt; should use your services.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On a technical level, I suggest you ditch the 13px base font size. Pixel size fonts cannot be enlarged from Internet Explorer&#039;s text-size controls, which can frustrate visitors that don&#039;t have 20/20 vision. On my IBM laptop, the &quot;medium&quot; font-size is 20px, so I get text that is very considerably smaller than what you see.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I know why you did this - larger text sizes break your layout. But any browser other than IE &lt;strong&gt;can&lt;/strong&gt; enlarge the text. There are also ways of getting bigger text in IE, so your supposed control of text size is mythical.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apart from that, I agree it&#039;s a promising start. Do let us see it when you have more content. Good luck.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 19:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>webwiz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1243214 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>I think, as Megan said, it&#039;s</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/please-critique-my-website-lovely-print#comment-1243149</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I think, as Megan said, it&#039;s very clean and a good start, but it is a bit plain to claim to help &quot;web and creative professionals.&quot;  It&#039;s hard to judge too much because the content isn&#039;t there yet, but for what I&#039;m perceiving your objective to be, the design is very white and empty.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not really sure what that shifting banner is up at the top.  Clearly you have a logo and a navigation, but then what is the function of the section below that?  It&#039;s hard to tell where to go next based on what is shown here in the sample.  What seems to be the main content (&quot;How we work,&quot; &quot;What We Do,&quot; etc) of the page is pushed way down beyond the initial view of the visitor, and while most people will scroll, it&#039;s typically a good idea to put the main content in front of people from the beginning.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From a design point of view, try varying some color choices a bit.  I think the choice of blue is very soothing and the images add a nice splash of color, but there is a LOT of white that is just not very visually appealing.  Lastly, all of your fonts (except for the logo) are the same, most of them even the same size, so I would think about smart locations to add some contrast with a serif font of some sort.  While many people think fonts like &quot;Times New Roman&quot; or &quot;Georgia&quot; are very outdated, from a design perspective, using them to add focus to a certain area or to draw focus away from that area is a great function.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Good luck with your website and I hope you can successfully pull it all together!  I&#039;d love to see it when it is completed! &lt;img src=&quot;https://www.webmaster-forums.net/misc/smileys/wink.png&quot; title=&quot;Wink&quot; alt=&quot;Wink&quot; class=&quot;smiley-content&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>kazimmerman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1243149 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>This looks good for a start.</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/please-critique-my-website-lovely-print#comment-1243147</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;This looks good for a start. Very clean layout. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Check the kerning on the logo text. The letters yPrin are noticeably tighter than the other characters. Some manual kerning might be required to get that to look right.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The other thing that stands out to me is the read more links. They&#039;re a bit too big and bold and draw too much attention away from the other elements.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 4-column footer looks odd below the 3-column main section. What kind of a grid are you using here? it would be best if the footer matched the 3-column main section but then you might end up with too much white space. The first column, under &quot;the site&quot; is confusing because it almost (but not quite) matches the top navigation. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What we do? isn&#039;t a question (shouldn&#039;t have a question mark).&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1243147 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
