<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1044030" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1044030</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
          <item>
    <title>Thanks for the advice</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/html-css-and-javascript/css-challenge#comment-1242485</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Thanks for the advice everyone. I decided to go down the road advised by webwiz in the end. Really enjoyed this project - its great to learn something new and put it into practice. The live site of the previous design can be seen at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rentinginleeds.com&quot;&gt;Renting In Leeds&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rentinginleeds.com&quot; title=&quot;www.rentinginleeds.com&quot;&gt;www.rentinginleeds.com&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 12:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>serpico</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1242485 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>For the semi-transparent</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/html-css-and-javascript/css-challenge#comment-1242253</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;For the semi-transparent border, I&#039;d use a nested DIV. The outer DIV would have a semi-transparent background, while the DIV carrying the content would have a white background and margins equal to the size of border you need.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t recommend using opacity, since that affects all contained elements. This is how I am doing semi-transparent backgrounds these days:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;#container {&lt;br /&gt;
  color: #fc6;&lt;br /&gt;
  background: url(images/argb44452713.png);&lt;br /&gt;
  background: rgba(45, 27, 13, .25);&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
* html #container {&lt;br /&gt;
  background: transparent;&lt;br /&gt;
  filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.gradient(startColorstr=#44452713,endColorstr=#44452713); /*AARRGGBB*/&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The background-image is a 1 x 1 pixel semi-transparent PNG that works everywhere except IE 5 and 6. The rgba background is only applied by browsers that recognize it - which is most of the current or soon-to-be-released modern browsers. Finally, you need to get rid of the PNG image for IE 5 and 6 and use a filter instead.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 18:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>webwiz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1242253 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>For the transparent</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/html-css-and-javascript/css-challenge#comment-1242251</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;For the transparent edge/surround border of course a png will be simple, or you could risk a CSS3 &lt;code&gt;opacity:.xx; &lt;/code&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
From what I&#039;ve tested it seems to work in most browsers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And it would be cool of course if IE accepted RGB alpha transparency &lt;code&gt;background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.2);&lt;/code&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
But alas with this and opacity IE will lag behind to be compliant as usual.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The background image looks like you are just going to have to have one full image. I don&#039;t really see any scope in it for any kind of fluid option.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 18:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1242251 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Hi Megan, Thanks for the</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/html-css-and-javascript/css-challenge#comment-1242250</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Hi Megan, Thanks for the advice. I think your approach of the transparent border with border-radius is a good idea. I&#039;m happy to go down that route. It&#039;s something I&#039;ve used before and it generally degrades gracefully in IE.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the design tips. Graphic design certainly isn&#039;t my forte, but is something I&#039;m always looking to improve upon so it&#039;s great to get advice.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 18:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>serpico</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1242250 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>How concerned are you about</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/html-css-and-javascript/css-challenge#comment-1242248</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;How concerned are you about browser compatibility? I would do the transparent border with CSS trancparency. It doesn&#039;t work in all browsers (and there&#039;s a special way of doing it for IE) but it would save you *a lot* of problems trying to do that some other way. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would also use border-radius (and -moz-border-radius, -webkit-border-radius) to do the rounded corners. They&#039;re subtle enough that the design should work without them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can I give you one little design tip? If you&#039;re using rounded corners the radii should be consistent. So the corners on the Quick Facts box should match the ones on the transparent border. I also think that if the Quick Facts box is rounded the one above it with the 3 clipart links should be too.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1242248 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
