we've been using todo backup

Bailifeifei — Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:13:25 +0000

we've been using todo backup server to regularly backup server for a long time. it offers full, incremental, and differential backup.
we usually set up a daily backup schedule, and save three versions of the images, which means that the software automatically delete the old images.
we are small business users, and cannot afford some backup software costing 1k dollar.
so we found todo backup suits us very well.
and i googled an article of easus about backup NAS, hope it can help.

This place is no longer using

BruceWilliO — Sat, 23 Jul 2011 03:58:07 +0000

This place is no longer using a domain controller. All server resources, printers, files, etc., are controlled by domain permissions. The only problem is that the NAS does not have the ability to be a domain client

This place is no longer using

andrewmartin9 — Fri, 18 Mar 2011 10:39:30 +0000

This place is no longer using a domain controller. All resources of the servers, printers, files, etc, are under the control of domain permissions. The only problem is the NAS does not have the ability to be a domain client as far as I know.

Before you back up Windows

chiery — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:59:00 +0000

Before you back up Windows Server 2003 to NAS perhaps you should know first the disadvantages if you do it :

Only one restore point per backup
Slower transfer speed
Bare metal restore requires network driver
Many NAS devices Linux based, don’t support NTFS and can have slow processors

Hope it help {links removed}

Your problem is not so

posting.work9 — Fri, 04 Sep 2009 17:44:19 +0000

Your problem is not so technical and can be easily solved. just check out the [url=http://www.idecogateway.com/] Linux firewall[/url]. it will solve all your problem.

You could use ShadowProtect

Awfers — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:11:18 +0000

You could use ShadowProtect (http://www.storagecraft.co.uk) to do this, and automatically encrypt the disk image. Plus, it will give you a backup of the WHOLE server that you can use to restore onto any type of hardware if the unthinkable happens (this has saved our bacon on more than one occasion).

Cheers,
Awfers

So there wasn't a problem

pr0gr4mm3r — Sun, 01 Feb 2009 14:13:39 +0000

So there wasn't a problem with leaving your backups unprotected?

I got the same problem so I

jane0109 — Sun, 01 Feb 2009 11:05:59 +0000

I got the same problem so I tried removing the password and it worked.

This place already does use

pr0gr4mm3r — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 04:46:04 +0000

This place already does use a domain controller. All the server resources, printers, files, etc., are under the domain control permissions. The only problem is the NAS doesn't have the capability to be a domain client (as far as I know).

Have you thought of setting

teammatt3 — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 02:40:13 +0000

Have you thought of setting up a domain controller? You can add the nodes to the domain, and all the connected devices can communicate without a username and password. Someone who cracks the wireless key (or plugs in) won't have access to the domain, so they wouldn't have access to those shared areas (unless they can crack your domain password too).

Probably more work than it's worth