By the way, I think that any

pacifich — Tue, 10 Aug 2010 06:35:47 +0000

By the way, I think that any US-based hosting provider can provide a great accessibility to your websites around the whole globe.

I think no difference between

yogi85 — Tue, 03 Aug 2010 10:26:43 +0000

I think no difference between these hosting

hello i prefer to host my

zarrikk — Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:22:00 +0000

hello
i prefer to host my sites using the US data centers because a majority of my website traffic tends to come the USA.but i would like to know what is the diffrence between US web hosting and UK web hosting?thanks

{links removed}

i don't think that the

iangould — Fri, 28 May 2010 12:59:19 +0000

i don't think that the location of any server matters too much but I would still prefer to have US web hosting because of its popularity and reliability

US web hosting is good and

ElaineMorris — Fri, 14 May 2010 12:21:00 +0000

US web hosting is good and cheaper than UK web hosting. this is only my experience.

Generally UK web hosting

davecoventry — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 07:41:31 +0000

Generally UK web hosting tends to be more specialised and more expensive.

I used UKlinux.net for eight or nine years and they cost me around 300 GBP per year.

For the last year or so I've been using hostmonster and am very happy with their service so far. Plus they are around 70 USD per year. See the link in my sig for what they offer.

UKlinux were fairly inexpensive at the time I joined them, but prices elsewhere have come down dramatically.

There is no any difference

whwkim — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 05:14:51 +0000

There is no any difference between UKweb hosting and US web Hosting.
The quality level is depend on the service provider only.

In my experience it's

technologynow — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:52:15 +0000

In my experience it's cheaper in dollars than in pounds.

It's not all that straight forward though.

If you do a whois for sites hosted by UK based hosting companies, you'll find that for price reasons, many of their actual servers are in Germany.

Similarly, for most of my .com sites I've used a cheap Canadian based hosting company for years, but all their servers are actually in the USA.

Google (and possibly others) does take note of where a server is, so if you are wanting the majority of your customers to come from the UK, it's good SEO practice to get a .co.uk name with a uk based server.

Similarly, if you want to target the USA, it's best to get a .com address that's actually hosted in the USA.

No there is as such no

pmorrison2588 — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:28:54 +0000

No there is as such no difference in service. all are same, with a little modifications in the costing. I can explain it to you with an example. They are just like the telecom service providers, that are all functionally same, but has separate brand names, locations, towers, and plans. I hope now it is clear for you.

You will find if you are UK

websprite — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:37:42 +0000

You will find if you are UK based company who hosts their site in America with a .com domain name then you will not appear in a search on Google.co.uk pages from the UK, if you have a .co.uk TLD then it will be OK to host in the US.

I prefer to Host UK sites on UK servers, you can't go wrong then.