<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1042284" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1042284</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
          <item>
    <title>Personally I have a pet</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/screencasts-formal-or-informal#comment-1235108</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Personally I have a pet peeve with introductions, every time someone says: &#039;Hi, I&#039;m X and am here to talk to you about my really cheesy Web application!&#039; It always reminds me of Troy McClure. That&#039;s probably a cultural thing though, I&#039;ve noticed even news readers introduce themselves on US/Canadian TV, so many people are used to it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But I do agree that the corporate way is lame too, worse than the Troy McClure approach. You can be personal without being chatty, professional without being faceless.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall: try to strike a balance, and adapt your style according to your audience.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Postscript: Abhi&#039;s advice on editing is good too.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>JeevesBond</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1235108 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>I think the personal</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/screencasts-formal-or-informal#comment-1235106</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I think the personal approach is usually better. Unless your target audience is more conservative for some reason.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Liam and I have this debate about how we should write articles on A Padded Cell. I prefer a more personal approach (&lt;em&gt;Next, you do this&lt;/em&gt;, or &lt;em&gt;you can easily ...&lt;/em&gt;) while he prefers to avoid the use of any personal pronouns.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1235106 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>I prefer the tone to be</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/screencasts-formal-or-informal#comment-1235103</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I prefer the tone to be informal, conversational but flowing, but the editing to be formal and professional.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Most important is the sound editing.  You may want to record narration in a second pass, so you get fewer interruptions, interjections and delays.  I can&#039;t stand screencasts in which the narrator is constantly umm-ing and aah-ing or making annoying sounds that in passing conversation would be ignorable, but are amplified in recorded tracks.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Abhishek Reddy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1235103 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
