<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1041862" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1041862</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
          <item>
    <title>I think the combination of</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/lamp-vs-wamp#comment-1269670</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I think the combination of them can get low acquisition cost.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sybella</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1269670 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>In terms of SEO both are</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/lamp-vs-wamp#comment-1268480</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;In terms of SEO both are equivalent but i would prefer lamp over wamp. lamp is complete open source and WAMP is not completely open source. XAMPP is a open, cross-platform web server, contains primarily the Apache HTTP Server, MySQL database, and interpreters for scripts written in the PHP and Perl programming languages.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 09:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>samual james</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1268480 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>I think xampp is much</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/lamp-vs-wamp#comment-1267867</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I think xampp is much better;but I have heard about AMPPS too and planning to use it for a week or so.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 11:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joey37</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1267867 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>search engines are concerned</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/lamp-vs-wamp#comment-1242142</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;search engines are concerned with inbound links, the worth of the links, title/meta/keyword tags and content not your hosting O/S&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 00:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>NickD</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1242142 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>I use MAMP for my local dev</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/lamp-vs-wamp#comment-1233823</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I use MAMP for my local dev server (Mac / Apache / MySQL / PHP) &lt;img src=&quot;https://www.webmaster-forums.net/misc/smileys/wink.png&quot; title=&quot;Wink&quot; alt=&quot;Wink&quot; class=&quot;smiley-content&quot; /&gt; but deploy to a LAMP server.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The OS has absolutely no bearing on the SERPS and there&#039;s no reason why it should - as long as the web server returns content properly it&#039;s all fine.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>andy206uk</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1233823 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>LAMP is really more</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/lamp-vs-wamp#comment-1233601</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;LAMP is really more popular..&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 09:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Finntroll</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1233601 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Yeah same, Xampp is what i</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/lamp-vs-wamp#comment-1233227</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Yeah same, Xampp is what i tend to use aswel. I find that it gives me a good server environment which i can work with.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since i can use it for MySQL aswel, it is good.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This just means that i can setup applications and scripts, and try them before i place them into a live environment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apachefriends.org/en/xampp.html&quot;&gt;Apache Friends - Xampp&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; is very good!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;~ Mike&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 08:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ms2134</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1233227 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>I use WAMP for local</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/lamp-vs-wamp#comment-1233214</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I use WAMP for local development (actually xampplite)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Then LAMP for live sites.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 02:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>decibel.places</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1233214 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>I don&#039;t know...Google might</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/lamp-vs-wamp#comment-1233191</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t know...Google might penalize people that use Windows Server to power their website.  If they don&#039;t, they should, because Windows Server users must have some serious problems. &lt;img src=&quot;https://www.webmaster-forums.net/misc/smileys/wink.png&quot; title=&quot;Wink&quot; alt=&quot;Wink&quot; class=&quot;smiley-content&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SEO is just the practice of making your site content easily readable to search engine spiders.  The operating has no play in how your pages are formatted and organized.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>pr0gr4mm3r</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1233191 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>It is more common to run AMP</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/lamp-vs-wamp#comment-1233188</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;It is more common to run AMP on L though &lt;img src=&quot;https://www.webmaster-forums.net/misc/smileys/smile.png&quot; title=&quot;Smiling&quot; alt=&quot;Smiling&quot; class=&quot;smiley-content&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1233188 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
