Not as much Ram as I would

lweeks — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:43:43 +0000

Not as much Ram as I would expect for that price - but not bad

We're not arguing, simply

greg — Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:09:48 +0000

We're not arguing, simply debating

Guys! Stop argueing. This

Musson — Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:17:27 +0000

Guys! Stop argueing. This topic has lost its tyopicality... some time ago... Sorry for being silent, but when I saw what is going on around the company and their 100% uptime I decided not to go with and forget about it completely, so, thank you very much for the replies, The question is resolved...

It is a good combination but

Phlip_corter — Mon, 06 Oct 2008 06:43:01 +0000

It is a good combination but all the Items depand on your requirement where you will take it's use on your home purpose or business purpose.

You're correct that it

pr0gr4mm3r — Sun, 05 Oct 2008 15:37:20 +0000

You're correct that it should be taken with a grain of salt. Hosts that provide guaranteed 100% uptime aren't saying their network will definitely be up 100% of the time. They're saying that if the network goes down, the customer will be reimbursed.

So like if you pay $6/mo for the hosting, and they go down for a day, even if they refund you for the month, it won't begin to cover the potential revenue for the day.

JeevesBond wrote: Hosts

greg — Sun, 05 Oct 2008 10:47:41 +0000

JeevesBond wrote:

Hosts that provide guaranteed 100% uptime aren't saying their network will definitely be up 100% of the time.

Surely that's exactly what they are claiming, by stating "guaranteed 100% uptime".

Otherwise, what does "guaranteed 100% uptime" mean? If they MEAN something else then they should say something else.

but 100% uptime server

JeevesBond — Sat, 04 Oct 2008 11:19:43 +0000

but 100% uptime server guarantee can't be true.

You're correct that it should be taken with a grain of salt. Hosts that provide guaranteed 100% uptime aren't saying their network will definitely be up 100% of the time. They're saying that if the network goes down, the customer will be reimbursed.

So it's not 100% uptime, but it is a pretty good feature.

For sure it's possible but

Freedom — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:51:13 +0000

For sure it's possible but 100% uptime server guarantee can't be true.

I think we shall ask someone

demopaul — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 06:41:56 +0000

I think we shall ask someone who had experience with that company to let us know how often it goes down if it does. Argueing will not bring us to the compromise, it will last until everyone become bored...

If you want my point - I think 100% network uptime is quite possible...

And what if for the next 3

greg — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:56:31 +0000

And what if for the next 3 months, you lose the network connection for 10 hours every week due to an issue with their system?

Would you then say "It cannot be 100% now as there has been a network loss".
Yes, of course that's how it would be, and therefore due to potential unforeseen circumstances that might happen like my above example, they cannot claim 100% network without using get-out clauses.

It's like me saying tomorrow, I know for 100% I will drink a cup of coffee. That's not possible as anything could happen to affect that. Death, electricity cut, water cut due to burst water main, I am ill and in hospital and coffee is not allowed due to my issue.
But I could use a get out clause, as do these companies. Such as
"Tomorrow, I will drink a cup of coffee 100% guaranteed
- As long as I don't die, there is power available, there is water available, my kettle doesn't break, I have coffe, milk and sugar, and as long as no other unforseen issues that could stop me having coffee don't happen"