<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1039546" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1039546</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
          <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/html-css-and-javascript/check-my-meta-tags#comment-1223966</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Um, well, it&#039;s not really true that meta tags are all that important (most of the time). Title is, if you call that a meta tag. Description is nice to have but not essential (and mainly because it&#039;s sometimes shown to users in the search results). Keywords and description are also helpful in preventing duplicate content problems but, again, they&#039;re nice to have and not essential. Two others you should have are content-type (tells the browser what type of document this is and which character set it&#039;s using), and content-language. They would look like this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some people seem to classify  tags as meta tags - they have a variety of uses as well such as providing a favourites icon (favicon) and alternate stylesheets for your site.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here&#039;s a &lt;a href=&quot;http://vancouver-webpages.com/META/metatags.detail.html&quot; class=&quot;bb-url&quot;&gt;full list of meta tags&lt;/a&gt;. Most of them either have very specific uses (telling browsers what to do, such as redirecting a page), are only used in certain circumstances by certain services (description/keywords), or basically aren&#039;t used for anything other than providing extra information for no reason (author, generator).&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 20:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1223966 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
