Talks_44 — Wed, 19 Sep 2007 17:32:06 +0000

minor errors..

ap1106 — Fri, 07 Sep 2007 20:47:05 +0000

Looks Brilliant!
My fav design layout atm! & i'm going through a phase of loving that blue colour as well lol

I really like the navbar too

the only tiny thing I can think to improve it, is maybe some different icons on the forum,
I think maybe even just using the : instead of would make it look rly good

other than that (and the errors of course) its great!

Good site

golferstube.com — Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:31:39 +0000

I like the site because if your site catches on it will take off. You just need really good content. I like the site I just didnt care for the Media Live Affiliates on the side of your page.

Ray. — Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:13:48 +0000

Those ones I knew, but thanks mate.

salsalero — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:07:11 +0000

I can fix all the errors, but I will help you fix some of the errors

Line 7, Column 163: end tag for "meta" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified.
…films, music, video games and more!">

Replace > with space />

Line 8, Column 431: end tag for "meta" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified.
…123reg, site5, hosting, domain, rss">

Replace > with space />

Line 9, Column 38: end tag for "meta" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified.

Replace > with space />

Line 10, Column 41: end tag for "meta" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified.

Replace > with space />

Line 11, Column 94: end tag for "meta" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified.
…y Wilson 2007. All Rights Reserved.">

Replace > with space />

Line 12, Column 44: end tag for "meta" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified.

Replace > with space />

Line 13, Column 44: end tag for "meta" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified.

Replace > with space />

Ray. — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 22:47:17 +0000

Megan;223343 wrote: Looks good at first glance. The colour scheme is nice and bright and the header graphic is well done (I hope you don't get in trouble for using that simpson's character!).

The front page could be optmized better to show off the content. The introduction is kind of redudant (and contains a glaring type-o). It would be okay if you were to explain in some detail what the site has and include some keywords for search engines. That, the quick links, and the big "welcome" graphic take up all of the "fold" space. That is, the part of the page that the user sees when the page first loads, before scrolling. There should be more here to bring the user deeper into the site and show off your content. The top content from the main section should be pulled onto this page, so the user can get going right away without having to navigate around.

Are you going to have some of your own content here or will the site just be links to other articles? It's going to be tough to search optimize a site without any of your own content.

The forum looks good - often people don't integrate forums into the main site very well. This one looks good.

I found that Bart picture on render-world.com. I think I SHOULD be okay using it.

Oh my god, what a terrible typo, thanks for bringing that to my attention! You make a good point, I will rewrite the introduction. I do intend to have my own content there, it was infact the original plan. I didn't want to get people to put in loads of effort though if we didn't have an audience. It's VERY likely that having columns/reviews written by our own members will happen. Also, im glad you like the forum! Im happy with how it's integrated.

salsalero wrote: The site don't look to bad, but I'm not a fan of the blue color

I checked your site on w3c
Failed validation, 40 Errors

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ww...Inline&group=0

Your keywords look a bit much. I usually have about 20 words max.

I'll look into getting it validated, although I don't know how to fix some of those errors. Also, I thought it was good to have lots of keywords?

salsalero — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 22:28:12 +0000

The site don't look to bad, but I'm not a fan of the blue color

I checked your site on w3c
Failed validation, 40 Errors

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.media-live.co.uk&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0

Your keywords look a bit much. I usually have about 20 words max.

Megan — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:47:41 +0000

Looks good at first glance. The colour scheme is nice and bright and the header graphic is well done (I hope you don't get in trouble for using that simpson's character!).

The front page could be optmized better to show off the content. The introduction is kind of redudant (and contains a glaring type-o). It would be okay if you were to explain in some detail what the site has and include some keywords for search engines. That, the quick links, and the big "welcome" graphic take up all of the "fold" space. That is, the part of the page that the user sees when the page first loads, before scrolling. There should be more here to bring the user deeper into the site and show off your content. The top content from the main section should be pulled onto this page, so the user can get going right away without having to navigate around.

Are you going to have some of your own content here or will the site just be links to other articles? It's going to be tough to search optimize a site without any of your own content.

The forum looks good - often people don't integrate forums into the main site very well. This one looks good.