https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1039214 en https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/site-structure-size-directories#comment-1222875 <p>I had a guy that had a database driven website. Lost the webmaster, continued to make files in html and had 500 pages. So he could run the site I took everything to html/php includes. Put everything in directories(folders)and then had to rebuild the page links ../../happy.html. I hope your not that far into this type of mess but if you are, Good Luck.</p> Thu, 09 Aug 2007 01:34:39 +0000 webfriend comment 1222875 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/site-structure-size-directories#comment-1222722 <p>thanks a ton... that was helpful... <img src="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/misc/smileys/smile.png" title="Smiling" alt="Smiling" class="smiley-content" /></p> Mon, 06 Aug 2007 11:11:23 +0000 cliffhanger comment 1222722 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/site-structure-size-directories#comment-1222603 <p>If you have that many pages then it's not normal to have them all as individual HTML pages, no. You should be using some form of a content management system that would make it much easier to manage all those pages.</p> <p>Otherwise, it if makes sense for those pages to be in the same directory, then that might not be a big problem. As long as it's still easy for you to manage. I did <a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/answers-to-ten-seo-questions-some-new-questions-from-danny-sullivan" class="bb-url">read something </a>just yesterday about how flat directory structures (fewer levels of hierarchy) are better for SEO (see question 10 in that link).</p> Fri, 03 Aug 2007 13:11:17 +0000 Megan comment 1222603 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net