<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1036943" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1036943</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
          <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/html-css-and-javascript/firefox-issue#comment-1212257</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Thanks a bunch, JeevesBond!  I&#039;ll definitely get on the test case thing soon.  &lt;img src=&quot;https://www.webmaster-forums.net/misc/smileys/smile.png&quot; title=&quot;Smiling&quot; alt=&quot;Smiling&quot; class=&quot;smiley-content&quot; /&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 08:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>nadamt</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1212257 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/html-css-and-javascript/firefox-issue#comment-1212251</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I would say your bug is a product of &lt;a href=&quot;https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144826&quot; class=&quot;bb-url&quot;&gt;bug #144826&lt;/a&gt; It might be worth constructing a test case to show the problem. After all, if you don&#039;t complain about it, they might think it&#039;s not an issue. &lt;img src=&quot;https://www.webmaster-forums.net/misc/smileys/smile.png&quot; title=&quot;Smiling&quot; alt=&quot;Smiling&quot; class=&quot;smiley-content&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 05:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>JeevesBond</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1212251 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/html-css-and-javascript/firefox-issue#comment-1212232</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;This is definately a problem with Firefox. If you comment out line 153 (/* ASTERISK MOTIF */) you&#039;ll see the problem goes away.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You&#039;ll also notice that it&#039;s not possible to position :after pseudo elements either (was discussing this with the missus). Seems the Firefox implementation isn&#039;t complete.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maybe Firefox renders the page, then puts in :before and :after pseudo-elements. Am going to have a quick look for bugs, see if anyone else has reported this behaviour. &lt;img src=&quot;https://www.webmaster-forums.net/misc/smileys/smile.png&quot; title=&quot;Smiling&quot; alt=&quot;Smiling&quot; class=&quot;smiley-content&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 02:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>JeevesBond</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1212232 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
