<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1036472" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1036472</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
          <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-design-and-graphics/dream-weaver-8-vs-mx-2004#comment-1209941</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I had a lot of rendering problems in MX, from what I remember. Although that&#039;s starting to happen in v. 8 now too. That&#039;s the biggest problem I have with DW, by far. I don&#039;t use a lot of extra features. Actually, it would be nice to have something a little more pared down, lighter, but that rendered properly.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 20:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1209941 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>dw8 v mx</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-design-and-graphics/dream-weaver-8-vs-mx-2004#comment-1209892</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I worked with MX for ages and then got DW8 when it came out, I still cannot work out the CSS stuff, when I link to a CSS it doesn&#039;t seem to work, even though the link is there in the code!!??!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I found MX better to work with - plus most of the extensions from Adobe (now) are not compatible with DW8, I had loads and had to uninstall them. I think I may switch back to MX when I start my next website.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mandy&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 23:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mandyjb</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1209892 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
