Too simple in design!!

HolyWarlock — Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:06:52 +0000

Site concept is good.If u

kaiz49 — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:22:22 +0000

Site concept is good.If u bring richness to the design part of the site it will be fine. once I go through what the idea behind the site was I must say that your site has the right idea by clinch the results.YOU can design the logo part littlebit better.

This website doesnt exist

FrostBoost — Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:16:44 +0000

This website doesnt exist anymore? Strange, it had a very good domain name...

Maybe I missed something.

Eljey — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:07:13 +0000

Maybe I missed something. Are we talking about http://www.olcore.com - gold ore deposits and copper market?

I cannot access what you say

ms2134 — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 08:12:30 +0000

I cannot access what you say is there. All i can see is some placeholder.

sorry ,I can't open this

bbmm1980 — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 06:01:05 +0000

sorry ,I can't open this domain.but I really want to visit your good site.

Search not effective

starzone — Sun, 03 Dec 2006 20:37:47 +0000

i searched for something using your site and no results were found
but i like the smiley face

olcore — Sun, 12 Nov 2006 19:46:06 +0000

Jonathan Dewey;210301 wrote: Hi Olcore,

Nice idea in principle but i am wondering how you intend to get sufficient "returned results" for ppl. This may have been fine in 1996 but you'll need a heck of alot of marketing to get it going.

Have you thought of perhaps adding a community feature to the search engine (check out chacha.com // trexy.com for some ideas)

Good luckwith it all! Hope you succeed!

Cheers
Jonathan

I think to answer most of your concerns, our crawler will handle most of the results worries that have been brought to our attention.

We have toyed with the though of a blog or something for us to post news and accept comments and feedback. I will check out those sites that you mentioned to see what you mean. We appreciate the feeback!

olcore — Sun, 12 Nov 2006 19:44:08 +0000

JoseffB;210106 wrote: I like the new logo but still it looks ALOT like google.

I understand your argument about Dmoz, but I understand is that Dmoz is actuall a core db for alot of search engines (not the other way around).

However, as a web surfer I'm interested in the results and I actually start wondering "why isnt this search using dmoz in addition to their own database?"

Thank you for the comment on the new logo. We are still working on a fresh new appearance, but the logo was a quicker change.

One reason we don't use another database, like dmoz for instance, is that we have no control over that data. If we want relevancy to be our key target, we need our own database in order to make Olcore as relevant as possible. We are, however, working on a crawler to help populate out database, but the key to it is that we still have the final say on site inclusion, meaning that even with our crawler, it is still human checked for relevancy.

Jonathan Dewey — Fri, 10 Nov 2006 12:49:19 +0000

Hi Olcore,

Nice idea in principle but i am wondering how you intend to get sufficient "returned results" for ppl. This may have been fine in 1996 but you'll need a heck of alot of marketing to get it going.

Have you thought of perhaps adding a community feature to the search engine (check out chacha.com // trexy.com for some ideas)

Good luckwith it all! Hope you succeed!

Cheers
Jonathan