demonhale — Mon, 02 Oct 2006 02:52:34 +0000

matt is right, these are not logos at all, Ill also say 1 for simplicity...

teammatt3 — Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:49:45 +0000

They don't really strike me as logos, more like headers. It looks like some regular text with a background image, I wouldn't consider that a logo. If I was forced to choose one, I would say the first one. It looks more sophisticated, more chess-like than the rest.

Check out logopond.com for some real logos.

mikexx2020 — Sun, 01 Oct 2006 21:01:36 +0000

Cool thanks alot dude! Really helpful.

I didnt quite like the 2nd one either but thought about using it because it was the most colourful one. Ta!

webmasterD — Sun, 01 Oct 2006 20:55:02 +0000

It's a tie between the first and the third. Both are excellent. Maybe use the third one for the homepage because it's grand, majestic and sparkling and the first one can be for a links page or internal page because it's simple, elegant and captivating. But really, both are great. I don't like the second one at all, the two sides do not tie into each other, it's like two seperate pictures.