The site is good for those

Eljey — Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:58:03 +0000

The site is good for those who have already been interested in links prior to entering it and the site will hardly get others interested IMHO. Maybe I have a warped mind but for me the site is not just a collection of links, we have the art of web design, don't we.

The title reminds me of that

Greensphere — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:39:16 +0000

The title reminds me of that film dude wheres my car.

Joking aside the header maybe could do with some work.

site doesn't work -- I

netsperience — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 02:18:25 +0000

site doesn't work -- I missed the smut?

weshallgo — Sat, 11 Nov 2006 03:59:47 +0000

If I don't have my browser full screen 'Funny pictures, videos, websites, news and more.' are all pushed way down. I like the url easy to remeber, I think you really need to spice it up a little for the type of site it is more graphics / colour. I think dates next to when stuff waas posted would be handy and one last thing seams to be a fair bit of space at the top of the page that could be used
Cheers Wes.

Jonathan Dewey — Fri, 10 Nov 2006 12:59:48 +0000

Hey Submitapic,

Interesting idea for a directory of chuckles - great url btw! Says/implies exactly what the site does

Perhaps as mentioned above/before you can add a few of the good pics/videos to the homepage so end users get and idea of what the site is about?

Another possible to think about is to decrease the space at the top of the page - there's alot of wasted space up there.

Good luck with the site - i'm sure i'll be coming back to find a few funny pics

Best
Jonathan

nONEq — Fri, 27 Oct 2006 01:11:26 +0000

Design should me more complicated and site should include caps for videos and pictures I think, so much text doesn't impress the visitors.

cretedesigns — Tue, 24 Oct 2006 23:30:01 +0000

I agree with most of what has been posted. It feels very generic and then it forces me to do a quick glance over and then once I do that . . .I just think it is smut and don't want to look anymore. I like the name though.

Busy — Sat, 21 Oct 2006 10:00:20 +0000

I think the layout is all wrong, this is the sort of site that should be work safe (viewable from work pc so if your boss caught you it could look like a 'work related' site - type thing)

maybe use more of a news related style, but you'd have to keep the language down a bit

pitbull82 — Fri, 20 Oct 2006 21:48:47 +0000

Well, this site doesn't impress me at all. When I see pages which are to wide to fit in 1280x1024 resolutions ... Well, I suppose I haven't seen such a page until today...

In addition I don't see anything interesting here either. Just simple collection of links.

Only advantege of the site is code - it's not so horrible, but it definitelly could be better...

mawooshen — Tue, 10 Oct 2006 07:34:20 +0000

Hey there,

^^ Definitely agree with above comments.

You should try and give your site some more color and a theme of some sort otherwise it just looks like some cheap link directory. The layout needs to either be made much smaller and fixed width so that even the smallest screens don't have to scroll horizontally or make it liquid so that it changes size to fit the window size. Some more description/thumb nails would be very helpful to make your main content seem more interesting. I also wasn't too sure what the difference between the links/cool stuff menus on the left was. Not sure you really need them.

Hope this helps!