https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1035569 en https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-design-and-graphics/image-quality#comment-1205596 <p>I've generally found that the file size for gif is smaller than png, which is why I haven't used it more. Or maybe I'm not doing something right???</p> <p>That program sounds good Greg, to my knowledge photoshop can't do that.</p> Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:41:10 +0000 Megan comment 1205596 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-design-and-graphics/image-quality#comment-1205558 <blockquote class="bb-quote-body"><p><strong>andy206uk wrote:</strong> Gif's should never be used for photos, only images with large areas of flat colours (logos etc) (although I'm starting to ditch the gif and use png's instead nowadays).</p> <p>Jpegs are far better for photos as your research proves!</p></blockquote> <p>That's exactly the answer I was gonna give <img src="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/misc/smileys/smile.png" title="Smiling" alt="Smiling" class="smiley-content" /><br /> Especially with the improvement of png support in IE7, I think I won't be making a lot of gif's in the future.</p> Wed, 09 Aug 2006 22:08:02 +0000 Jack Michaelson comment 1205558 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-design-and-graphics/image-quality#comment-1205551 <p>Gif's should never be used for photos, only images with large areas of flat colours (logos etc) (although I'm starting to ditch the gif and use png's instead nowadays).</p> <p>Jpegs are far better for photos as your research proves!</p> Wed, 09 Aug 2006 20:59:37 +0000 andy206uk comment 1205551 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net