<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1033832" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1033832</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
          <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/what-do#comment-1197229</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I would have to agree with Renegade. It&#039;s hard to believe but some people just don&#039;t want to go any bigger. The issue isn&#039;t cost or standards... it&#039;s preference. The problem is trying to accommodate both sides of the 1024X768. If you make a site that will contract to fit the smaller screens then it will be considerably different in the larger screens. I think the best bet is to center all content at 760px. That way, everyone sees the same thing... except for the negative space of course.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote class=&quot;bb-quote-body&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Quote: *&amp;amp;&amp;amp;^$%$^$%&amp;amp;T&amp;amp;$#@#$.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;...Hey, i speak cartoon curse and that&#039;s not very nice.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 17:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>The Ape</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1197229 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/what-do#comment-1197178</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I think the 800x600 resolution &quot;rule&quot; still applies today, it probably still will for some time.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 02:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Renegade</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1197178 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/what-do#comment-1197165</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Don&#039;t want to hijack this thread, but isn&#039;t 800x600 just too small for most browsing these days?&lt;br /&gt;
I was thinking, and designing my latest site to work great in 1024x and to &#039;step down ok with minor scrolling to 800. This site is an artist site and I know she is running her browser at an unusally high res.&lt;br /&gt;
I am curiuos as to what others are doing now. I know the 8x6 rule was dominate 2-3 years ago, but now???&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;~dragonsjaw&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 18:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dragonsjaw</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1197165 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/what-do#comment-1196836</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Design your website in 800x600.. This may be the best way to cover all visitors..&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 21:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sarangan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1196836 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/what-do#comment-1196734</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;fix it for 1024x768 or do like the &#039;gurus&#039; do and fix it for 468x720 (or whatever the size is).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;but just remember just because it says someone is using 1600x1200 doesn&#039;t mean they are viewing that much, toolbars, large icon on tool bars, side bars .... can cut down the biggest screen size down to under 800x600 viewable space.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Depends a lot also if the sites pages would be printable.&lt;br /&gt;
 I printed off some stuff and wasted heaps of paper trying to get the contents to fit (solid fixed width layouts) and copy/edit source was out of option as every line (1000&#039;s of them) were fixed CSS sizing. In the end I printed in landscape mode and got most of it. I&#039;m going to make my own version of that sites content (is just a products id numbers and usage etc) so people are able to print it or at least resize to be printed&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 22:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Busy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1196734 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
