ab420 — Sat, 06 May 2006 03:43:48 +0000

Personally, I don't like the red bits other than that, I think it looks really nice! Good work!

bluecircle — Fri, 05 May 2006 23:37:17 +0000

CptAwesome wrote: I was reading the disclaimer and became very wary by 2 statements:

Those to me screams botted traffic, as most external counters will not see bots because they are based on Javascrript or image loading (neither of which (most) bots do) and I really don't buy into the 'can't handle the huge amount of traffic' as we have a few sites that get far more than 10,000 hits and are recorded accurately by our 3rd party stat counter. Or would Google AdSense impressions count (those are raw hits/pageviews, but I think the IPs/Uniqueness is still tracked).

No, that's just put in there to protect us from an error on their/the counters end. Maybe I should make it more clear.

CptAwesome — Fri, 05 May 2006 23:30:32 +0000

I was reading the disclaimer and became very wary by 2 statements:

Quote:
Stats, Data and other information from third party counters (e.g. Extreme-DM.com, hitbox) are not sufficient to establish a claim. These counting systems tend to yield an improper count. If we dispute your claim, you must provide us with RAW server logs from the site and time period in question - this is the only reliable method of counting a visitor.

Quote:
In the event that there is a discrepancy between the amount of traffic delivered by Quality Traffic Supply and the amount of traffic delivered to the client, on their behalf Quality Traffic Supply and the client both agree to use the report prepared by the traffic supplier

Those to me screams botted traffic, as most external counters will not see bots because they are based on Javascrript or image loading (neither of which (most) bots do) and I really don't buy into the 'can't handle the huge amount of traffic' as we have a few sites that get far more than 10,000 hits and are recorded accurately by our 3rd party stat counter. Or would Google AdSense impressions count (those are raw hits/pageviews, but I think the IPs/Uniqueness is still tracked).

CptAwesome — Fri, 05 May 2006 23:16:52 +0000

I noticed on the order page (as I am considering give this a try) that the prices don't appear until you hover over the dropdown boxes, the prices should probably be populated on load instead of on hover/onchange.

Other than that I like the site, and the concept.

bluecircle — Fri, 05 May 2006 19:17:42 +0000

I've made a lot of new updates since the last post. Any suggestions?

jamesrayhan — Tue, 18 Apr 2006 12:54:02 +0000

Hello All

if you are looking for traffic on your websites and would like to exchange webhosting related links vist top rated hosting site Please visit

http://www.webhosting-rated.com/links/form.html

“Secrets of Top 10 Web Hosting Services Unveiled! By Experienced Webmasters

If you are looking to get a reliable Web Hosting Package then I suggest you visit this site [url]http://www.webhosting-rated.com”[/url]
james

I like it...

remindme — Wed, 12 Apr 2006 20:11:37 +0000

actually I liked it so much that I decided to see if your traffic program works for me and bought in for the trial offer..

I will keep you posted as to what happens..

hurricaneshutte — Tue, 11 Apr 2006 19:09:17 +0000

Testimonials alway work well in convincing people....what exactly is this type of traffic you are sending?

cms1 — Tue, 11 Apr 2006 17:33:14 +0000

I think, that site could be 100% wide, not only 780 px.

bluecircle — Tue, 11 Apr 2006 10:13:42 +0000

Janet wrote: As someone that may be interested in your service, I also agree that testimonials would do wonders for this site. However, in order to be believable as opposed to appear made up, you would probably need to inlcude the website link with the testimonial.
Nice design, I like the site.

Great, I am working on the testimonials page now, and should have the page up in a week or two.