<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1033450" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1033450</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
          <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/cms-more-work-static-sites#comment-1194773</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I&#039;m starting to build up a library of pages, the pages used to make the one page. granted most sites are different but having a library of sorts allows to reuse a lot of stuff (using classes or functions if pear not installed)&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 21:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Busy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1194773 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/cms-more-work-static-sites#comment-1194764</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;It&#039;s definitely a lot of work, but like you said, can add tons more flexibility in the end.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For me, it really depends on the size of the site. Both the starting size, and the estimated size in the future. And it just depends on the nature of the site. News-type sites, I can&#039;t see doing with anything other than a CMS. Same for personal blogging sites, of course.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 19:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>timjpriebe</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1194764 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
