<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1033204" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1033204</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
          <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/webmaster-directory-webmasterstreetcom#comment-1194108</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;The site looks very nice to me (a newbie silver surfer)  I found my way round very easily (always a plus for me).  It is clear about its content.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I cannot comment about the design as I know nowt about designing anything but it looked nice and easy to read. &lt;img src=&quot;https://www.webmaster-forums.net/misc/smileys/nerdy.png&quot; title=&quot;Cool&quot; alt=&quot;Cool&quot; class=&quot;smiley-content&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 18:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Magnolia</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1194108 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/webmaster-directory-webmasterstreetcom#comment-1194033</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;The site looks very well-designed, a professional layout and the search interface works quite well (I found a couple banner exchanges that I really liked). The forums are drastically different from the rest of the site though, I think you should have still used the blue and grey format from the rest of the site. Looks like your site is off on the right foot!&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 04:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>farmer_Tom</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1194033 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/webmaster-directory-webmasterstreetcom#comment-1194025</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;The template itself looks good.  Not too template-y which is the usual problem with these things.  The problem is that you can tell by the contents that it&#039;s a template because the look and feel isn&#039;t quite ine line with the template. The shade of blue for the links, for example, isn&#039;t the same as what&#039;s used in the overall design. There also has been no attempt to bring in the brownish colour used for the exterior border. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Browsing around - the forum uses very different colours from the template again. The layout of text is generally unsophisticated looking. If you look at a directory listing, for example, everything is stuffed into little boxes, there is clashing red &quot;new site&quot; text, A lot of things are badly spaced and aligned.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The navigation buttons jump around on mouseover in Opera (very strange).&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 20:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1194025 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
