<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1033176" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1033176</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
          <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/philwingcom#comment-1194024</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;To get similar quality from a GIF the file size would be rougly double what it is now. The way I understand it is that if the image is a photograph (or mostly a photo) then JPEG&#039;s compression works best, but if it is a drawing or some other computer generated image then GIF works best. That&#039;s held true in my experience.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 20:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>IanD</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1194024 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/philwingcom#comment-1194023</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;You should save it as GIF. Simpler images come out much better as GIFs in my experience.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 19:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>robfenn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1194023 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/philwingcom#comment-1194017</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;robfenn is right, the font on the navbar gets very pixelated at larger sizes. The font size for the rest of the site seems fine to me, but since everybody&#039;s saying it&#039;s too big I&#039;ll play around with it some more.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The main header jpg doesn&#039;t seem noticably fuzzy to me, and as it&#039;s already 17.5k I don&#039;t think it&#039;d be good to up the quality any.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 18:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>IanD</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1194017 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/philwingcom#comment-1194002</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I think the font used for the navigation will only look good at smaller sizes. I would say the text within the site is actually far too big.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall, nice, one small thing though. Is the logo a .jpg as it&#039;s a bit fuzzy?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-Rob&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>robfenn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1194002 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/philwingcom#comment-1193973</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not sure if you&#039;ve changed the font or not but it looks fine to me.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think the flouo light pic is to deep, at 800x600 with tool bars etc, when I click on a new link nothing changes on screen, I have to scroll down to see the changes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Useless information, the pic of the lights isn&#039;t in fitting with your name true light, if you look at the end of the tubes you&#039;ll see purple marks, this is a sign they are on their way out. They will last a while yet but are not giving out 100% true light as a new set would. They will go yellow or purpler giving less light as they get older. (It&#039;s scary knowing this)&lt;br /&gt;
I doubt anyone would ever pick this up, but like I said at the begining - useless information.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 21:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Busy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1193973 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/philwingcom#comment-1193940</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Nice design! I thought the navigation font was a bit small, and the font of the content on the inner pages was a bit big. Also, I assume the True Light/Buy Now link will be updated before the new design goes live.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Other than that, looks great! Certainly one of the better looking sites I&#039;ve reviewed here.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>timjpriebe</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1193940 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/philwingcom#comment-1193934</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Very nice. Maybe you can consider using a smaller font for inner pages.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Good luck !&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>F15.Com</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1193934 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
