<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1033140" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1033140</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
          <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/site-speed#comment-1193704</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;If you&#039;re using the firefox web browser you can disable javascript and images (both from tools/options/content and uncheck load images and uncheck enable javascript).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Even with these two disable the page still takes a bit to load, your rss feeds dont help but is the length of your page&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 20:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Busy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1193704 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/site-speed#comment-1193696</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Your site could be improved quite a bit from that one sales page layout. It would be good for several reasons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. SEO - More pages looks better to the search engines. Also, it gives you more chances to go for more keywords using your title and description tags.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. Usability - If that page was spread over three or more pages, it would load faster and be more organized. Also, It wouldn&#039;t seem so long if it was spread out. That page scrolls forever.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. Trust - After people have been on the web a while, they have probably been burned at least once. If they have ventured into online marketing, they have probably been burned by someone with a one-page mini-site like yours. I realize that those pages convert, but maybe a more traditional site that looks more trustworthy will convert better.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m sure there are more good reasons to fix your site, but those three are probably the strongest reasons.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 18:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Michael Allison</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1193696 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/site-speed#comment-1193695</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Just right click on an image and you can get the details.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 18:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Michael Allison</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1193695 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>sizing</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/site-speed#comment-1193694</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;how can you tell how big my images are just from looking at the page?&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 18:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dguilloryjr</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1193694 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/site-speed#comment-1193679</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Apart from the messy coding,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Your live chat window that floats about, do you really need that?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Perhaps your web host server is slower than your competitior&#039;s too&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 12:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1193679 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/site-speed#comment-1193675</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;place all your external javascript links at the bottom of the page, compress your images, tidy your code (lots of wasted tags in there).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Your background alone is 66kb, the picture of the girl is 28kb, the small picture of the mite is 17kb thats over 100kb in just 3 images&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 09:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Busy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1193675 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/webmasters-corner/site-speed#comment-1193661</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Put your site and the competitor&#039;s through &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.websiteoptimization.com/services/analyze/index.html&quot; class=&quot;bb-url&quot;&gt;http://www.websiteoptimization.com/services/analyze/index.html&lt;/a&gt; and maybe that will lead you to the reason. &lt;img src=&quot;https://www.webmaster-forums.net/misc/smileys/smile.png&quot; title=&quot;Smiling&quot; alt=&quot;Smiling&quot; class=&quot;smiley-content&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Geez, your site takes more than 500 seconds to load on a 56k modem. You need to redesign your site, you aren&#039;t going to get that down unless you make drastic changes.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 04:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>teammatt3</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1193661 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
