https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1032923 en https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-design-and-graphics/which-way-better#comment-1192693 <p>For me it would also be the second one. Really just a personal preference, though. I like my folder structure to match what I think of as the flow of my site. It looks like the flow you're thinking of would match up best with the second one.</p> Mon, 06 Feb 2006 13:22:05 +0000 timjpriebe comment 1192693 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-design-and-graphics/which-way-better#comment-1192581 <p>I find using the second one easier for sharing files (and moving things around). you can use ../ or ./../ etc but if you move a file/folder then you have to edit it all.<br /> Downside is your folder can get real big and some hosts set a max display limit on ftp programs.</p> <p>Really there isn't much difference, the folder names may be better for search engines over underscores (only just).<br /> If you don't want to share files, not worried about separate folder uploads - flip a coin.</p> Sat, 04 Feb 2006 22:13:21 +0000 Busy comment 1192581 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net