<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1032307" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1032307</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
          <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-design-and-graphics/flash-site-flash-plugin-detection-or-not#comment-1189713</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;i would say this a job for the A-Team.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;p.s like ur sitemap:)&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 13:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ilovefrontpage</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1189713 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-design-and-graphics/flash-site-flash-plugin-detection-or-not#comment-1189157</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Yep I agree with dk01, That also takes care of JS disabled UAs such as SE crawlers as well&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 18:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>chrishirst</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1189157 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-design-and-graphics/flash-site-flash-plugin-detection-or-not#comment-1189154</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I would say have them redirect to the html version by default and then have a hidden flash object that loads if they have flash and redirects them to the flash version.  This way if they don&#039;t have flash installed they are on the html version.  If they go to the flash version and don&#039;t like it then just have a small link the allows them to switch back to html. My 2c &lt;img src=&quot;https://www.webmaster-forums.net/misc/smileys/smile.png&quot; title=&quot;Smiling&quot; alt=&quot;Smiling&quot; class=&quot;smiley-content&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 18:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dk01</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1189154 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-design-and-graphics/flash-site-flash-plugin-detection-or-not#comment-1189148</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I would say go with the four options on a splash page to give people all available options, as I have flash installed but generally I hate flash websites so would go for the html version most times.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 14:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>The Webmistress</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1189148 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-design-and-graphics/flash-site-flash-plugin-detection-or-not#comment-1189133</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;You could just use the flash as direct route but offer &#039;html version&#039; for the non flash folks. The non flash folk would just get a &#039;install plugin&#039; broken image thing.&lt;br /&gt;
 nice to know I&#039;m not the only one who doesn&#039;t use flash.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 07:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Busy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1189133 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
