Renegade — Sun, 30 Oct 2005 07:47:21 +0000

Um... are you serious?

How can people come to you as a "resource" when you don't even look "worthy" of it.

I mean, not only does it not have a design, it's even lacking a simple title for all your pages.

02bunced — Sun, 30 Oct 2005 07:12:54 +0000

As I was saying before Jeeves lost my post , you need to have a good quality design to be taken seriously on the web. Now, whether you make it yourself or spend some money on a web designer, I feel it is essential. As a consumer market, internet users are very picky and webmasters/designers are often the worst! Provide good content with a stunning design and you may have a chance!

Megan — Sat, 29 Oct 2005 21:30:13 +0000

There are a billion crap webmaster directories out there but very few good ones. So there is opportunity there. This, on the other hand, is not even close to being of good quality.

If you can't do graphics yourself, get a template done or work with a designer who can help you out. It is absolutely essential to have a halfway decent logo and some sort of layout design. There doesn't seem to be any content here but when you get some it needs to be top quality -too many directories will only list in exchange for a linkback, which means that they are only missing out on the best sites.

Good luck with it

mscreashuns — Sat, 29 Oct 2005 13:57:24 +0000

The moving links are making me dizzy, and the banner animation is too fast to even be noticed by most people.

I don't understand why the contact form is aligned to the right on the contact page. It's very simple, and there's not much else to say about it.

Busy — Sat, 29 Oct 2005 04:51:04 +0000

Starting to look like a link farm already.
Ask yourself, does the net really need another webmasters directory? have you seen how many are out there.

As for the site itself. The animation really needs to go, it makes it look cheesy, as if you haven't used any of the links yourself (ie link farm).
You need some kind of style for your categories, bold is good but to much bold is bad.