r3a1 — Tue, 09 Aug 2005 15:23:56 +0000

greetings. i realize the polls are closed, but i felt i would add my remarks. i don't read 101 in logo #1. it is a little too abstract for what point 101 does. you need a logo that will be read easily and will convey your message to the viewer. logo #2 is more interesting, but i don't think it matches your target audience. you might try a more illustrative, hand-drawn logo for your site. i really think you need to play up the fact that you sell contemporary art, photography etc.

JeevesBond — Thu, 04 Aug 2005 21:54:14 +0000

Hmmm, it's sufficiently different from iomegas logo I think. The second one is by far the best.

Greg K — Thu, 04 Aug 2005 20:56:44 +0000

First impression on seeing the images, the left one reminded me of iomega's logo. (see http://www.dataclinic.co.uk/jaz-disk.jpg)

I take it you have changed the logos since your first posting, as I see no coloring in them, just black and grey.

If I had to choose between the two, i'd pick #2.

-Greg

locatepeople — Thu, 04 Aug 2005 20:10:41 +0000

2 for a website but I can see no.1 being the better if you were stamping it on crates.

wwwben — Thu, 04 Aug 2005 16:46:04 +0000

demonhale — Thu, 04 Aug 2005 05:27:28 +0000

any other options? 2nd one looks great but looks like IOI instead of 101

Renegade — Thu, 04 Aug 2005 02:17:33 +0000

Yip, second one for me as well

openhost.us — Wed, 03 Aug 2005 22:31:43 +0000

I also like the 2nd logo, good luck

mattbutterworth — Wed, 03 Aug 2005 18:53:43 +0000

Initally - I didn't like either of them...my brain wanted to have a go at redesigning the logo itself.

The more I look at #2 the more I love it. It really works.

Saying that, I've just dropped it into Fireworks a deleted the blue areas and I feel that it looks better. I may be over stepping the mark here (sorry if I am - I'm not a designer or anything), but I think it looks more striking.

Talkfreelance — Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:37:42 +0000

I think the second one is better personally.