<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1029300" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1029300</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
          <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-hosting-and-domain-names/domain-names-and-search-engines#comment-1171534</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;domain names have very liitle or no weight in the SERPs &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;if they did, wouldn&#039;t books.com (Barnes &amp;amp; Noble) be top for a search of books rather than Amazon ?&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2005 16:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>chrishirst</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1171534 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-hosting-and-domain-names/domain-names-and-search-engines#comment-1171532</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I beg to differ. I have several websites testing this theory and I do get indexed better, of course having related content on the website helps as well. So I believe there is some weigh factor involved.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2005 15:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>clientcenters</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1171532 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-hosting-and-domain-names/domain-names-and-search-engines#comment-1171454</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;It weighs 0%. The main thing that a domain name can give you is name recognization.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 02:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mairving</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1171454 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
