<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1029110" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1029110</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
          <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/tenchialt#comment-1170760</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I need new feedback! I just posted my brain out in the form of news/images/everything! Please do consider re-evaluating my portal as it is now near completion. Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2005 09:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ptrferdinand</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1170760 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/tenchialt#comment-1170606</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;The [x]s are fine after that discription. As for the tiny text, that&#039;s a load. You need to make them a point or two larger. We&#039;re not talking much, just a couple of points. The flow will still be there, and your fanbase won&#039;t get headaches after ten minutes on the site. Also, a DOCTYPE is always necessary. You&#039;ll lose alignment in certain web browsers if you don&#039;t have your DOCTYPE and have your html validated. You can&#039;t blame your Fanbase for not having a DOCTYPE that&#039;s just being lazy.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 02:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Assassin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1170606 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/tenchialt#comment-1170600</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I hate the way you make us click [X] instead of a link.........itwould be better if you linked the [X] and a link. I know they are for the fanbase and all but I had to wrestle with an X for half an hour just to get to the seasons list.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s not very interesting, is it? I mean, the content and all is good but the colours......aperson can only have so much white. Try to make the background like the banner, that would look pretty cool!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why use such a small space? Why not use all of the screen? It looks too tiny and fragile.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not even going to get started on the forums.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All-in-all, your site is brilliant, but has a few minor niggles. Keep up the good work!&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 18:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>karriston</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1170600 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/tenchialt#comment-1170566</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design &amp;amp; Header:&lt;/strong&gt; Traditional Japanese sites, not American-influenced, typically utilize this tactic as a mode to attract users, with a basic design and a nice header.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Doctype &amp;amp; the X&#039;s:&lt;/strong&gt; This again leads back to anime&#039;s roots, the original, official Tenchi Muyo website, back in 1997, utilized the X&#039;s as the primary navigational links, and to preserve that site&#039;s operation for fans, I did the same. At the moment, I do not believe a DOCTYPE is necessary.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Forums &amp;amp; Font Size:&lt;/strong&gt; I was tweaking the new forum system a bit yesterday so I took it offline, sorry for any inconveniences that may have caused you. As for the font, it is what makes the site flow nicely, because it&#039;s supposed to be &#039;tiny,&#039; it works.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Thanks for your nice remarks on...&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
-the header.&lt;br /&gt;
-the idea of the X&#039;s, although not mine.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 02:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ptrferdinand</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1170566 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/tenchialt#comment-1170563</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I hate frames, you use them well, but they&#039;re still frames. I&#039;d lose them if I were you. Contrary to Studioworks, I don&#039;t think there&#039;s anything wrong with simplicity. I think that the look of the site is good. You do, however, need a doctype and as I said before you should probably look into losing the frame if possible.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You do have one MAGOR design flaw. You&#039;re site leaves huge spaces on either side of the screen with no content. You have space, use it.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 01:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Assassin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1170563 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/tenchialt#comment-1170533</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;It&#039;s too basic, too simple , too small.. i agree that font does look good in firefox , the header also looks good, i like it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why do i have to click on the X and not the text in your navigation ?&lt;br /&gt;
Why do you use frames ?&lt;br /&gt;
Why dont you have a DOCTYPE ?&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 14:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>StudioWorks</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1170533 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/tenchialt#comment-1170513</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;The font looks fine in Firefox, but it is a bit small in IE. I would make it one size bigger &lt;img src=&quot;https://www.webmaster-forums.net/misc/smileys/smile.png&quot; title=&quot;Smiling&quot; alt=&quot;Smiling&quot; class=&quot;smiley-content&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I agree about the X&#039;s ... It&#039;s not a bad idea, it just takes some getting use to. I personally wouldn&#039;t do it because it&#039;s not very guest friendly. If you really want to go that route though then I would make the X&#039;s bigger and a different color.. Maybe blue or something to show that they link.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Design wise I think it looks fine. It&#039;s clear and easy to read. But it wouldn&#039;t hurt to add more color and images imo.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The content is kind of lacking.. Not much there.. And your forums aren&#039;t working either.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2005 22:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>takai003</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1170513 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/tenchialt#comment-1170467</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Can I just ask why you want to make people click on the &quot;[x]&quot; to vist a link in your navigation? Why not just link the word(s)? It&#039;s probably fine the way you have it now, it just takes some getting used to and you may just end up making people leave because of it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The text on your site is so small, perhaps increase the font size a bit? Users don&#039;t really want to squint to read your content &lt;img src=&quot;https://www.webmaster-forums.net/misc/smileys/tongue.png&quot; title=&quot;Sticking out tongue&quot; alt=&quot;Sticking out tongue&quot; class=&quot;smiley-content&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2005 06:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Renegade</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1170467 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
