The Wicked — Sat, 11 Dec 2004 21:50:05 +0000

Thanks, guys, this helped all right!

Greg K — Thu, 09 Dec 2004 12:09:20 +0000

Jack Michaelson wrote: You can let the browser scale them, but hey... there goes image quality.

Not only do you loose image quality, no matter what size the browser reduces the image to be displayed, the visitor still will have to download the full size images. HEIGHT and WIDTH for images should be used what they are ment for, to tell the browser what size image to expect and leave room for. They are not ment to be image editing tools.

-Greg

Jack Michaelson — Thu, 09 Dec 2004 10:20:34 +0000

So you want scaling images huh?

There are 2 main ways to do this:
-You can let the browser scale them, but hey... there goes image quality.
-You can make several images for several screen sizes. Then let a javascript function decide which image to display.

There's also a third option, which is a combination of these 2 above By the way: I wouldn't check on resolution, but on client's height and width, which is the actual size of the user's active browser window.

Does this help?

Busy — Thu, 09 Dec 2004 10:16:29 +0000

either fix it to the smaller size (to suit 800x600) or use width="100%" (perfered)