<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1025396" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1025396</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
          <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-database-development/how-much-can-access-handle#comment-1155622</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;access is a little one to 5 user database it&#039;s engine is slow and nothing as been done to make better for the web. comparing access to any sql server is like comparing paint and photoshop.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2004 16:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>druagord</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1155622 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-database-development/how-much-can-access-handle#comment-1155239</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;MySQL is free and is so much better than access that it makes me lightheaded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Access + WWW = bad&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;MySQL + WWW = good &lt;img src=&quot;https://www.webmaster-forums.net/misc/smileys/smile.png&quot; title=&quot;Smiling&quot; alt=&quot;Smiling&quot; class=&quot;smiley-content&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2004 05:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>vexcom</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1155239 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-database-development/how-much-can-access-handle#comment-1154452</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Access includes an upsizing tool to migrate to MS SQL.  There are also plenty of tool s out there to move to MySQL as well.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2004 16:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>openmind</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1154452 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-database-development/how-much-can-access-handle#comment-1154451</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;is access sql  compatible?&lt;br /&gt;
if not you might want to set up a dev server and migrate everything to using the php pear db so that you can interact with any sql. or to a specific sql if you would like. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;and then move things over once you have your scripts working.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;remeber, it&#039;s very easy to make a very small mistake that causes big headaches, so always try to test first.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2004 16:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>m3rajk</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1154451 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-database-development/how-much-can-access-handle#comment-1154446</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;There&#039;s a couple of schools of thought here.  Access is not a production database and is limited in the number of concurrent connections it can suypport.  I used to run a site serving 250,000 page views on an Access DB (shudder) and it coped...just&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Looking back I should have made the switch to MS SQL sooner but hey you live and learn.  If your site is getting weird now on the level of traffic you are getting I would make th switch sooner rather than later.  Don&#039;t forget that you could also use MySQL if the cost of MS SQL from your host is prohibitive..&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2004 13:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>openmind</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1154446 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
