TargetZion — Mon, 31 May 2004 23:48:08 +0000

Allow me to start off by saying emode is quite possibly the least credible source you can find... Past that, I'd like to know where you aqcuire your information on the actual score required... The only undisputible evidence I have is my score result sheet I acquired from a licensed tester. Unfortunately, I am unable to show you that for obvious reasons, but doing a basic google search [Genius IQ Score] gives you a list of results [I only went about 5 deep] that all say the same thing: Genius is 140 and above. What more do you wish for, Mr. Nicora? What proof will be good enough for you? I would say that my score sheet and the fact that my college of choice also accepts the results as accurate would be enough for me... At what point do you admit you're wrong? Because you are. No offense, of course, simply pointing out the facts... Also, Mr. Nicora, nobody is claiming that 130 is genius. As I explained in an early post on this thread, the 130 on my site is a typo, if that's what you're referring to... Anywho, please folks, let's get back to the topic at hand here... Any other comments on the site?

For those interested, I've taken the liberty of attaching links...

http://www.wilderdom.com/intelligence/IQWhatScoresMean.html

http://members.shaw.ca/delajara/IQBasics.html

nicora — Mon, 31 May 2004 16:01:59 +0000

Excuse me for being off topic folks. TargetZion: It's all relative, I scored 145 with Emode's IQ test, but I'm sorry to say that I am no genius. I scored 133 with MENSA, which would grant me membership, but that still does not make me a genius. Depending on which test you take your score will mean completely different things. Einstein, who really was a genius had an IQ of 160+. All I was saying is that a score 130 is not genius level. And neither is 140 for that matter.

TargetZion — Mon, 31 May 2004 14:52:48 +0000

Megan wrote: It's the avatar, Mike. You're using that avatar, which is modeled after that old Target Zion design you posted.

Hahaha... Touche...

Megan — Mon, 31 May 2004 14:00:38 +0000

TargetZion wrote: My business site?

I think you're mistaken... Target Zion Studios hasn't had a site up for a couple months... We've been too swamped with other work to redo our own site... If you look, http://www.targetzionstudios.com is nothing more than a 404 error... Perhaps you're thinking of someone else?

It's the avatar, Mike. You're using that avatar, which is modeled after that old Target Zion design you posted.

TargetZion — Sun, 30 May 2004 12:42:18 +0000

Hahaha... Always the one to give me the boot in the *ahem*, aren't ya Suzanne? Actually I'm not really the 'graphics' guy in our little outfit, that's more of Brian's style... But, hopefully, I'll learn my fair share while I'm in college. For those who don't know, I'm majoring in Multimedia & Web Design at the Art Institute of Philadelphia starting in July.

But anywho, you're right, I do mostly text alterations because that is what I know, and I do very little non-text graphics on my own... I'm the code guy//Dreamweaver guy between Brian and I... Brian is also going to be attending the same school as me, in case you were all wondering. But he'll be studying photography.

Suzanne — Sun, 30 May 2004 03:04:16 +0000

Do you do any graphics work yourself, Mike? Or do you restrict yourself to text alterations? The reason I'm asking is that the skills are quite different and I'm wondering if you're resisting some changes because they fall outside of your comfort zone?

Just another kick in the pants to stretch your wings and take changes, make mistakes, get dirty!

(Also, I'm glad it's an in-joke, but it does come across differently without the context -- if nothing else, it's a call for you to make obvious what is hidden!)

TargetZion — Sat, 29 May 2004 16:34:06 +0000

I guess you call yourself 'warbishop' because you like to start conflict. Just because I point out that someone is wrong, does not mean that I am being negative. I respectfully informed Nicora of the actual number IQ one needs to be considered genius, and I said that I ~~thought~~ Megan was wrong, but later confirmed she was right. So sir, your claims are unfounded. Good day.

Please keep the ACTUAL reviews coming, they're all very appreciated, and helpful. Thanks all...

lol

warbishop — Sat, 29 May 2004 16:07:16 +0000

According to you, everyone is mistaken, guess I am as well.

War

TargetZion — Sat, 29 May 2004 15:44:50 +0000

I don't understand what you mean. I think I'm taking it fine. I'm not getting defensive or mean. Just responding truthfully, and THANKING the people who responded for their input. Warbishop, I'm sorry if you take this to be negative, but unless your two cents is referring to my site, please don't post on this thread. Kind of a waste of time don't you think?

For everyone who critiqued so far: Thank you again. If you took my responses to be negative, then you have my apologies for not being more clear. I have taken all of your comments with a smile. I don't think that faulty information being pointed [Megan & Suzanne were correct, I just dug up some old files and checked] out is negative.

So I ask you, Warbishop, "what are you talking about?"

lol

warbishop — Sat, 29 May 2004 15:24:19 +0000

For someone who asked for the review. You don't take criticism very well. Personnally, I welcome it because it makes people better.

Just my two cents i guess.

War