spl1nter — Sat, 03 Apr 2004 16:35:58 +0000

Well, the design is tableless. But tables are meant to be used to organise information so obviously I'll use them for that. But there will be NO nested tables.

acsinclair — Fri, 02 Apr 2004 20:50:48 +0000

I don't know...I don't think that I would want a forum to be "tableless" so to speak. Especially as the information lends itself to a table forum. On the other hand, your design looks very nice...and if the code is clean & standards compliant I might give it a shot.

Cheers,
Erica

eniety — Thu, 01 Apr 2004 15:37:20 +0000

It is clean, but you will definitely have a lot of competition -- especially free BBSs

spl1nter — Fri, 26 Mar 2004 18:43:03 +0000

Thanks a lot

Old Socks — Thu, 25 Mar 2004 22:55:50 +0000

Thats a very clean and easy forum - i'd use it.
But as mentioned - you have a lot of competition.

spl1nter — Tue, 23 Mar 2004 20:51:17 +0000

You can take a look at how it's shaping up here: http://home.graffiti.net/spl1nter:graffiti.net/

Don't expect the look to stay though It's changed so many times in the past month.

spl1nter — Mon, 22 Mar 2004 19:44:14 +0000

I've been pretty busy working on the main design. Nearly done now

I've been having great fun seeing how I can change the look of the site using the CSS alone. I can create new sites in 10 mins. It's really fun

Chroder — Wed, 10 Mar 2004 23:27:03 +0000

I'm doing the same, and mostly for the same reasons I don't believe there is a need though, there are tons (163) of them out there.

spl1nter — Wed, 10 Mar 2004 23:12:20 +0000

My site is currently XHTML Strict and CSS compliant. I am using CSS for the design so no

Well, I've used one, but it's for a perfectly acceptable part - the calander.

Other people have also expressed their feelings that they would really like to have a standards compliant BB.

Well, I'm off to code it

Suzanne — Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:50:33 +0000

I'd be interested in a standards-based forum software package. As for the need? I don't know.

I do know that a lot of software is horrific in its generated code.