m3rajk — Sun, 18 Jan 2004 02:56:32 +0000

95/98/me supports multiple users. i thought it merely locked the naming/editing to the creator unless otherwise told to.

the guy that made vms was contracted to help out in wnt. that's why it was given wnt before they came up with the words for the acronym. i figured it'd be better because of that.

apparently it's better with user privledges but doesn't quite do that right. i know on *nix if it's called from your user it's you, but from the webserver (go to it through a browser)it operates as the webserver (and subsequently, would theoretically be possible to have the same effect if you're not careful... i haven't tested it so i don't know for sure)

necrotic — Sat, 17 Jan 2004 02:14:20 +0000

It's windows2000 (NT Based).

druagord — Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:22:39 +0000

It cna't be one of those 95/98/me since they don't support any kind of user priviledge

m3rajk — Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:19:40 +0000

another diff between windows and operating systems done right:

user priviledges

you just exploitd a problem with window user privledges. what os? if you use a wnt (vms anyone?) base i'll be more suprised than 95/98/me

druagord — Fri, 09 Jan 2004 16:39:52 +0000

This is probably because on windows php run as the webserver user IUSR_machinename wich get more rights then your user.

Mark Hensler — Thu, 08 Jan 2004 03:06:17 +0000

Thank you, Billy G.