<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1021782" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1021782</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
          <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/review-request-taskcentric-template#comment-1134458</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I can see what Megan means by being generic.  I&#039;ll even say a tad bland.  But now I&#039;ll switch that around and say that&#039;s fine with me.  You accomplished a clean and professional overall appearence and that&#039;s what is most important in my book.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ll note that at 800 by 600 I got a Hscroll bar.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And now I get to the big stuff.  &lt;em&gt;Once your header finally loaded&lt;/em&gt; I thought it looked very nice.  Polished.  It impressed me with it&#039;s little into movie, as did the moving clouds that followed.  Animated menu is well done but not necessary, and the beeping menu sound was annoying.  &lt;strong&gt;However&lt;/strong&gt;, in the real world I would NEVER have seen it!  I would have left long before it ever loaded.  I sat around for over two minutes with noting atop the page.  My philosophy (not in web design but in my real world practices) is that if I wait over 30 seconds I&#039;m out of there and you lost my business.  Yes I&#039;ve got a 56k but that&#039;s still over half the world so don&#039;t piss off the majority of internet users.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ya gots ta get that page load time way down!  Otherwise like I said, I liked the look, so good job in the design aspect.  I wish that animation can stay because I liked that too, but IMO you&#039;d be shooting yourself in the foot.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2003 03:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>fifeclub</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1134458 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/review-request-taskcentric-template#comment-1134247</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Thread title updated as per posting agreement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are you looking for a review of this as a customized site or just as a template?  As a template it looks good (except for the big gap between flash section and first content box in Opera*). As a site it&#039;s really, really generic.  Hard to know what exactly this company is about.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In general, I&#039;m finding that the look is attractive, if generic, and the flash navbars are kind of interesting.  However, if you&#039;re using flash for navigation you should really provide a text based alternative. In addition, I&#039;m finding the sounds on mouseover to be really irritating. It might be better if they weren&#039;t so high pitched. The font size is also too small for large amounts of text to be read comfortably.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* okay, this is odd - when I visited the site a second time that gap is gone but there&#039;s a new one on the right side between the flash part and the right sidebar &lt;img src=&quot;https://www.webmaster-forums.net/misc/smileys/confused.png&quot; title=&quot;Confused&quot; alt=&quot;Confused&quot; class=&quot;smiley-content&quot; /&gt; Could just need a valign=&quot;top&quot; somewhere.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2003 15:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1134247 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
