JeevesBond — Fri, 11 Jul 2003 12:54:27 +0000

Ooops, sorry dk01...It's the Avatar that does it, just kinda sticks in your mind.

Busy — Thu, 10 Jul 2003 22:56:39 +0000

was actually dk01 who listed the sites, but thanks for thinking of me

JeevesBond — Thu, 10 Jul 2003 17:01:50 +0000

Hey, looks nice!
The only bug immediately apparent is the menu on the top right of the page, this is rendered across two lines in IE 5 (1152x864).

This does look a little boxy, but serves its purpose well, and will no doubt get you some revenue from Amazon sales! As Busy said you may want to get some inspiration from those sites he listed...They look great!

Melter — Thu, 10 Jul 2003 12:00:22 +0000

Hi,

I've finally updated the whole site with the new design and would love some feedback. Thanks.

authoretica.com

Melter — Wed, 28 May 2003 10:04:16 +0000

I wasn't quite happy with the first layout so I've made a second one. The first one is still there for comparison (see first post at top of page). The new layout can be found here: test page 2

The graphics need some more work and I'm not sure whether to drop the rollovers altogether. Any views on anything?

Thanks

Busy — Sat, 24 May 2003 05:38:56 +0000

no real point of the graphic, unless you want to show off your skills

which one did you check, 3.2 or 4.0 ?
your css will fail in the 3.2 as well as some html and the & is needed to validate to 4.0

IMO you should go XHTML 1.0 transitional

Melter — Fri, 23 May 2003 23:18:35 +0000

Cheers Busy. As the css is now validated is there any benefit to adding the W3C graphic to my site to show this?

Checking the page at Anybrowser under the HTML 4.0 Transitional level brings up script errors on the graphic rollovers. Any ideas with that?

Thanks

Busy — Fri, 23 May 2003 22:51:30 +0000

it's all the same error (same link), replace the & in the ad line with &

Some ad sites state the code shouldn't be touched/changed so you might want to check it out first. You're only using HTML specs so it's not a big problem if you leave it in, page will display the same either way, just wont validate 100% (I have a site I left the ad as it was, wont validate now because of it, everything else does so it's a trade off)

Melter — Fri, 23 May 2003 15:20:08 +0000

Quote: Originally posted by clubart
But there is no logo, no banner?

Busy: Looked at the validations and I'm now css validated. The html one though has 8 remaining errors (all relating to one of the ads on the page) that I can't shift. Any ideas besides removing the ad?

clubart — Fri, 23 May 2003 04:31:16 +0000

But there is no logo, no banner?