<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1021100" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1021100</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
          <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/server-management/faulty-ms-security-patches#comment-1131435</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I leave my server on Auto-Update of patches and have not had any problems yet. If I do ever encounter problems, I just let MS fix them remotely.  Of course, I have to pay but I let them know they will pay if they screw up my server!&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2003 23:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>hk5754</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1131435 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/server-management/faulty-ms-security-patches#comment-1129988</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I think it&#039;s best to have a testing system setup for a production environment.  Meaning, if I had a valuable box, I would first install XYZ on a machine with a similar setup and give it the what-for.  If it survives, then proceed to install on the live box.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2003 09:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mark Hensler</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1129988 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/server-management/faulty-ms-security-patches#comment-1129975</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;good question, i guess it depends whether you want your comp/server to crash from an error or an attack&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2003 23:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>brady.k</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1129975 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/server-management/faulty-ms-security-patches#comment-1129967</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Here&#039;s a solution: Get a Mac &lt;img src=&quot;https://www.webmaster-forums.net/misc/smileys/big.png&quot; title=&quot;Laughing out loud&quot; alt=&quot;Laughing out loud&quot; class=&quot;smiley-content&quot; /&gt; :-D&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;ve had mine for over a month now, no &#039;security patches&#039; none of that&lt;br /&gt;
The only update it did was automatically update Quicktime for me&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Seriously though, I never had any problems with patches on the multiple years I was with Windows&lt;br /&gt;
I have read a lot of reports of patches that don&#039;t work though&lt;br /&gt;
Is it better to install a patch right away before an attack would take place? Or wait 2 weeks ot make sure it&#039;s good and meanwhile leave your server/computer vulnerable??&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2003 22:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>nike_guy_man</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1129967 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/server-management/faulty-ms-security-patches#comment-1129955</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;i generally download patches every two weeks, i have yet to have problems, as i dont dl ones that just came out, i wait for them to fix the fixes...just wait a bit after you recieve a notice about one, to make sure it doesnt need fixing too, and you will be fine&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2003 21:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>brady.k</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1129955 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/server-management/faulty-ms-security-patches#comment-1129899</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;*checks windows updates*&lt;br /&gt;
Gah, 2 new ones to do.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I generally install them as soon as my system try pops up with that bubble thing.  I&#039;ve not had any noticeable probelms.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2003 23:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mark Hensler</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1129899 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/server-management/faulty-ms-security-patches#comment-1129885</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;It is a big groan sometimes patching systems. I installed an Exchange patch the other day. After that the Exchange service wouldn&#039;t restart. So I uninstalled it, that didn&#039;t work. I reinstalled it and that didn&#039;t work. Finally after a couple of reboots and a couple of hours, I saw some documentation about moving the internal NIC to the top and the External to the bottom in the Bindings. Well it already was but when I brought the external to the top and then flipped it back to the bottom, rebooted the server and it was fixed. Still two needless hours of my time wasted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Often I think MS rushes patches out without a whole bunch of testing just to fix a security hole. Then when they find out that they break things they issue another fix. It is a sad process.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are about 30 meg&#039;s of Critical Updates since the first of the year. I haven&#039;t really had much problem with the patch that you listed. Is it on a server exposed to the wild or on a machine sitting behind a firewall.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2003 21:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mairving</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1129885 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
