<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1020296" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1020296</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
          <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/review-request-wwwauthoreticacom#comment-1125110</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve made some changes on one of the pages to stop the text look like it&#039;s floating. Any comments before I alter all the pages?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.authoretica.com/authors.htm&quot; class=&quot;bb-url&quot;&gt;authoretica - test page&lt;/a&gt; &lt;img src=&quot;https://www.webmaster-forums.net/misc/smileys/smile.png&quot; title=&quot;Smiling&quot; alt=&quot;Smiling&quot; class=&quot;smiley-content&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2003 19:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Melter</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1125110 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/review-request-wwwauthoreticacom#comment-1124767</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;i like it, very simple color scheme, easy and relaxed, just right for reading, simple links and easy going, i really like it and it has a different touch to it.cool 9/10&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2003 17:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>hclear</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1124767 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/review-request-wwwauthoreticacom#comment-1124123</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Thanks fifeclub the contact addresses are now clickable.&lt;img src=&quot;https://www.webmaster-forums.net/misc/smileys/wink.png&quot; title=&quot;Wink&quot; alt=&quot;Wink&quot; class=&quot;smiley-content&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2003 23:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Melter</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1124123 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/review-request-wwwauthoreticacom#comment-1124119</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Very nice stylish header.  Thou it feels somewhat disconnected from the rest of the site.  I don&#039;t know if a thin bounding border or a slightly lighter shade background behind the content would help.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the authors, links, and contact pages you place the &quot;directions&quot; on the right side column.  That works fine for links and contact because they don&#039;t really need explaination, it doesn&#039;t work for me on the authors section.  I mean, I know what&#039;s going on but natural workflow causes me to start on the topleft... that&#039;s where the alphabet-tagets should be.  And right away I was confused by SF and ALT wondering what that meant.  I&#039;d swap sides.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the contact page the email addresses aren&#039;t clickable.  I see that if you read the expalaination below that the word &quot;here&quot; is clickable, but I think that it would be better the other way around.  As soon as I see the address I know whether I want to click it (which I can&#039;t) so I don&#039;t need to read what&#039;s below it.  It&#039;s just human nature that if you list a full email address that you&#039;d assume to click on it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But the site looks good.  Very smooth and stylish. &lt;img src=&quot;https://www.webmaster-forums.net/misc/smileys/smile.png&quot; title=&quot;Smiling&quot; alt=&quot;Smiling&quot; class=&quot;smiley-content&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2003 21:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>fifeclub</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1124119 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/review-request-wwwauthoreticacom#comment-1124100</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Megan: The only reason I added some commentary is that with their only being 20 authors listed so far news on them is a bit thin on the ground, and I didn&#039;t want the first page that greets people to look too bare. And I didn&#039;t want to add anymore authors in case I needed to make any drastic changes to the site. But I take note and you won&#039;t find anymore commentary being added.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The point about the reviews is that I need ppl to send them in (I&#039;ve had two so far) therefore these pages would be empty until that happens, so rather than give ppl a blank page to look at I use a stock page that tells visitors there aren&#039;t any reviews yet for that book and ask for reviews to be sent in. Better that than a dead link! This is a new site so will take some time to build up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This covers one of Taff&#039;s points as well: Icons. The &#039;marble&#039; is there purely as decoration. I wanted to put a matching icon there to indicate each section but;&lt;br /&gt;
(a) I couldn&#039;t find any free ones that were suitable and,&lt;br /&gt;
(b) my attempts to make my own have been disastrous so far.&lt;br /&gt;
As the &#039;marble&#039; now seems comfortable where it is, if I can ever sort out some decent icons I&#039;d probably like to make use of the circles as Megan suggested.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What else? Erm...I like the black outline on the imagetexts so that stays. I might be tempted to increase the font sizes but I quite like the colours I&#039;ve used, although I might change the gold/green colour that seems to offend most.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the response and I look forward to reading more.&lt;img src=&quot;https://www.webmaster-forums.net/misc/smileys/wink.png&quot; title=&quot;Wink&quot; alt=&quot;Wink&quot; class=&quot;smiley-content&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2003 13:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Melter</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1124100 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/review-request-wwwauthoreticacom#comment-1124088</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Overall pretty good and I agree with what&#039;s already been said, so I wont repeat it. I&#039;m just going to add that I find the graphics at the top a bit fuzzy with that hairy look overcompression gives (or text as jpegs) and I feel it should be a tad wider so it fills 800*600 and doesn&#039;t feel quite so skinny at larger resolutions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Good work &lt;img src=&quot;https://www.webmaster-forums.net/misc/smileys/smile.png&quot; title=&quot;Smiling&quot; alt=&quot;Smiling&quot; class=&quot;smiley-content&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2003 08:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>The Webmistress</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1124088 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/review-request-wwwauthoreticacom#comment-1124071</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;&#039;nuff has been said but one more thing from me, there is a bit of empty space at the bottom, i&#039;m sure you don&#039;t need it &lt;img src=&quot;https://www.webmaster-forums.net/misc/smileys/smile.png&quot; title=&quot;Smiling&quot; alt=&quot;Smiling&quot; class=&quot;smiley-content&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2003 22:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Renegade</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1124071 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/review-request-wwwauthoreticacom#comment-1124067</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;It looks like it&#039;s missing something.&lt;br /&gt;
The words on the navigation are way to small.&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe have a border around the text section or a different color background under the text to enhance it as it&#039;s a little hard to read. I&#039;d increase the font size and make the content section a bit wider.&lt;br /&gt;
Overall I like the effect but it&#039;s like a murder mystery with the last few pages missing.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2003 20:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Busy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1124067 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/review-request-wwwauthoreticacom#comment-1124059</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I like what you&#039;re shooting for in theory but it isn&#039;t quite working in practice. Clear as mud? &lt;img src=&quot;https://www.webmaster-forums.net/misc/smileys/wink.png&quot; title=&quot;Wink&quot; alt=&quot;Wink&quot; class=&quot;smiley-content&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I like the approach of changing colour scheme per page but have trouble with the way it is implemented.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Like Megan, I dislike the link colour, particularly with that background. Even more, I dislike the &quot;yellowish-brown&quot; text colour you use to the right.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The graphics up top have an unfinished look about them (what *is* that marble about anyway?) and doesn&#039;t really mesh well with the &quot;minimalist&quot; approach in the body - you&#039;re overdressed up top and rather naked down below &lt;img src=&quot;https://www.webmaster-forums.net/misc/smileys/smile.png&quot; title=&quot;Smiling&quot; alt=&quot;Smiling&quot; class=&quot;smiley-content&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2003 19:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>taff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1124059 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/review-request-wwwauthoreticacom#comment-1124058</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve never understood why so many web sites feel the need to put a running commentary of behind the scenes changes on the front page.  I mean, who cares?  I don&#039;t.  Show me the content already!  Some of this is legitimage news but a lot of it is irrelevant.  Better to use this space to highlight new or prominent authors and other important content.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Navigating around here a bit - don&#039;t link to stuff that&#039;s not there!  I&#039;ve followed a couple of links to an author&#039;s review section and found nothing but a notice asking me to review a book!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m finding it really hard to read that green text on the blue background, and it&#039;s on the small side too (my current major pet peeve!).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cranky criticism aside, I do like what you&#039;ve done with the interface.  It&#039;s good a good look and feel going, although I feel that some changes would be in order.  First of all, if you&#039;re going to do a fixed width design I think there should be some sides to it so the content area just doesn&#039;t go floating into space at higher resolutions.  I like to do the sides in a different colour which provides some contrast and defines the spaces on the page.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another problem I see is that the navigation items seem really smooshed.  Those should definitely take up more space.  I&#039;m also wondering about the circles along the top.  I actually thought that those would do something - they seem to regularly spaced to be just decorative.  What you could do is develop those into a navigation system, replacing the existing smooshed text look.  You could do some neat things with icons in those cricles.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2003 18:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1124058 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
