The Webmistress — Sun, 05 Jan 2003 11:27:03 +0000

I agree that the woman needs to fit hard against the edge or you see whitespace around the top & left which spoils the look.

I'm getting an error on the Web Hosting page:
Line: 10
Char: 1
Error: Object expected

And I agree that the logo should link back to the home page of the site from all pages.

Abhishek Reddy — Sun, 05 Jan 2003 11:07:45 +0000

Much better. But I'm gonna be fussy and say this isn't up to the old one's standard yet.

I like the top nav, but the datestamp seems out of place. How does it look with the date either on the left corner or right corner of other buttons?

For some reason, I don't like the margins around the central image with the woman in it. Have you tried it without padding it (so it's up against the edge)?

On the Web Hosting page, the Additional Features table is right up tp the side links. You'd probably want to add some space between them. In fact, IMO, that table looks out of place where it is. Maybe it'd be better in the main section of the page itself.

The whole Web Hosting page is a little wider than the other pages. It's easily noticed when switching to other pages.

Last thing I'm going to pick on is the fonts. The "heading" font (Verdana?) in the images on the main page and others is very plain and boring. I suspect you're going for a simple and elegant look, but Verdana just doesn't cut it. Especially when you have the freedom of an image file. I suggest trying some other sans fonts.

Overall, it's looking much better. You've almost won me over.

zollet — Sun, 05 Jan 2003 10:19:06 +0000

Thanks. The logo has been improved, but it's still temp and I will make a better one later. Also I might put something on the top right, not sure yet...

Renegade — Sun, 05 Jan 2003 07:06:20 +0000

Man! I like the new one better than the old one, the old one seems too bright and too common, for a hosting company.

One thing about the nav though...if the nav buttons changed on mousedown instead of mousever :S

Your logo seems a bit lonely there by itself I think it's longing for some comfort from it's fellow content

zollet — Sat, 04 Jan 2003 20:46:18 +0000

Quote: I'm going to say that I like the new one better

Yey! Finally got one that likes the new design better than the old one. I'll turn you one by one

Quote: After I click a category (nav button) I want to be able to go back to the main page... not the main part of that category. I thought that clicking the logo at the top would, but that brought me back to the top of that category

I don't understand...

Quote: What about extra bandwidth? If I go over 2,000 MB in a month, is it $20 per extra MB or $.20 per month? Could it be more? Less? who knows!
Also, there isn't that much a difference between features on the plans. One plan is $4.95 paid yearly and the other is $8.95 yearly, but the only major differences I see are with diskspace and bandwidth allowances

Thanks for letting me know. Extra bandwidth has now been added. You are right, the main difference is space/bandwidth since that's what costs and also that is the main difference between different websites. However, if you look at the 2 first packages, you'll also notice that the 2nd package allows you to host more than 1 site in the same account and also more emails, FTP accounts, mailing lists, subdomains, databases, etc.

nike_guy_man — Sat, 04 Jan 2003 17:40:56 +0000

I'm going to say that I like the new one better
The nav buttons at the top are easier to manage than the old one
However:
After I click a category (nav button) I want to be able to go back to the main page... not the main part of that category. I thought that clicking the logo at the top would, but that brought me back to the top of that category
About the plans:
What about extra bandwidth? If I go over 2,000 MB in a month, is it $20 per extra MB or $.20 per month? Could it be more? Less? who knows!
Also, there isn't that much a difference between features on the plans. One plan is $4.95 paid yearly and the other is $8.95 yearly, but the only major differences I see are with diskspace and bandwidth allowances

If you really wanted to make that space where the date is interesting.... put the dancing banana in it!

The old site isn't bad but the new one is marginally better

The Webmistress — Sat, 04 Jan 2003 15:14:24 +0000

That's gonna get annoying after a while!

zollet — Sat, 04 Jan 2003 15:00:41 +0000

Yeah, maybe I'll add "Customer Reviews" to the top menu.

(Have you ever seen a cooler smilie? )

The Webmistress — Sat, 04 Jan 2003 14:32:49 +0000

How about just leaving it off and respacing the other links there?

zollet — Sat, 04 Jan 2003 14:31:04 +0000

What should I have there instead of the time/date? I can't just leave it empty.