Renegade — Thu, 19 Dec 2002 07:52:37 +0000

haha yeah Susanne I always prefer my bold my links, then underline (or over if it calls for it) as for the "bold phase" I sure hope it passess soon cause I find it quite annoying "inline"

Suzanne — Wed, 18 Dec 2002 23:10:01 +0000

Last month was different background? Damn, I did that three years ago... Oh, the fun of being an early adopter.

Bold on hover is perfectly wonderful if you bold your links in the first place. ha!

Busy — Wed, 18 Dec 2002 22:45:14 +0000

It's all a fad, this month is bold on hover, last month was different background on hover (real cheezey), next month could be overline on hover (if it was compatiable on all - its not) everything has its time in the spot light, gets abused (look at flash or frames), fades away to be replaced by something else.

Another reason to keep using NS4.7, cause most of these "fads" don't work on it

Renegade — Wed, 18 Dec 2002 22:35:19 +0000

Oh OK, I just see it sometimes and it really irritates me how they just "jump" out onto the page, so I finally decided to ask if it was "good" or not to do that.

Abhishek Reddy — Wed, 18 Dec 2002 11:14:58 +0000

It's ok, IMO, if the link is in, say, a navbar or something, where turning bold doesn't shuffle around things. But for "inline" links in body text and such, emboldening can displace it... which is a great irritation.

The Webmistress — Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:54:24 +0000

I too hate it as it generally makes the page jump about!