Re: JKD Preaching Again

jkd — Sun, 18 Aug 2002 21:26:45 +0000

Quote: Originally posted by caislander
jkd,

What do you do go forum to forum preaching the glory that is MOZ?

Because ultimately, it makes things easier for all developers (esp. me ) if more people used Moz. I can do more with less code while abiding by web standards in Mozilla than I could ever do in IE. So by promoting it, I hopefully encourage other developers to uses and and promote it on there own, until it becomes a dominant browser.

CodingForums, JavascriptCity/Pageresource, SitePointforums, Devshed, I can't overlook these ones too.
Everyone must witness the greatness of the lizard!

[Josh] — Sun, 18 Aug 2002 16:35:11 +0000

Ok...
Well, I would say I know a fair bit about HTML, but I'm new to the others. I've heard of them but what are the differences?

JKD Preaching Again

caislander — Sun, 18 Aug 2002 00:57:07 +0000

jkd,

What do you do go forum to forum preaching the glory that is MOZ? j/k jkd, anyway Moz is an excellent browser probably the best out there but till it becomes the dominant browser it doesn't do us much good.. So I will just keep coding XHTML Transitional (most always) or Strict (when possible) till all the browsers ncatch up, something tell me I will be waiting awhile

jkd — Sun, 18 Aug 2002 00:45:20 +0000

XHTML 1.1

Internet Explorer doesn't really support it, but as long as I leave out the <?xml?> processing instruction, and serve is as text/html, it knows enough to go into CSS1Compat mode and render it like it would other XHTML.

If it was up to me though, everyone would use Mozilla and then I could properly serve XHTML as application/xhtml+xml complete with processing instructions...

disaster-master — Fri, 16 Aug 2002 07:45:28 +0000

I have successfully done two sites in XHTML Transitional and am working on a third now. Should have it finished by tomorrow complete with error free validation.

I love it when that happens(error free).

Haven't tackled the Strict version yet. Maybe next.

Jack Michaelson — Thu, 15 Aug 2002 07:23:28 +0000

Still using html 4.0 transitional, but currently making the move to xhtml.

Megan — Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:03:15 +0000

I'm using xhtml 1.0 transitional almost exclusively right now, with a few minor exceptions for NS 4.x compatibility. Hopefully at some point I'll get some time to try strict on a personal site.

The Webmistress — Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:05:20 +0000

Since I have started using Dreamweaver MX I have been using xhtml 1.0 transitional, so that's my last two sites.

Abhishek Reddy — Wed, 14 Aug 2002 05:53:47 +0000

I'm still using HTML 4.01 Transitional. Not yet made the move to XHTML... although, my next site will be.

Suzanne — Tue, 13 Aug 2002 21:49:58 +0000

Also, I coded a client site (not up yet, I'll link it when it is) to HTML 4.01 Transitional. Why? Her audience is primarily made up of, no kidding, N4.x users. *sigh*