davidjaymz — Tue, 06 Apr 2004 10:11:01 +0000

LOL yep I just sat there going "hmmm" even switched from firefox to IE just to check something hadn't worked...

Why would you remove the site but leave a BG? odd

mrtom-uk — Mon, 05 Apr 2004 19:45:34 +0000

I tried to visit the site but there is nothing there apart from a crazy background and the scroll bar changes colour
waited for a minute but gave up
(on 600K broadband)

Busy — Sun, 04 Apr 2004 09:57:21 +0000

check the date of the orginal post and you'd find this thread was started Mar. 08, 2002

Some sites disappear after a while for many reasons

TargetZion01 — Sun, 04 Apr 2004 06:49:02 +0000

Nothing is showing up except the hideous background texture. No text, pictures, or anything.

mairving — Sat, 09 Mar 2002 15:48:48 +0000

You have some problems using table widths as a percentage. If someone's browser window is too small the navlinks will overlap the text. You should make the navlinks a fixed width and the text variable to prevent this.

Here is what I am talking about:

taff — Fri, 08 Mar 2002 15:16:53 +0000

In addition to what's been said...

Your navigation looks pretty lonely out there at higher resolutions and doesn't exist at all on your guestbook page.

Maybe "Web Log" and "Depression" should open new windows since they are such a complete departure from the rest of the site?

disaster-master — Fri, 08 Mar 2002 01:53:41 +0000

Interesting. I like it. The colors work well together and I love that bg image on the home page. It sure does take a while to load though. I would be curious to know if it would load faster if you made like three separate table (header, body, footer)and put it in as a table background. Might not but it might.??

Those are some cute graphics you have on your web sets page.

Oh, I agree that you need some padding for the body part. Also, the text is a bit small but it was readable. Guess I am not getting as old as I thought.

The Webmistress — Fri, 08 Mar 2002 00:45:58 +0000

I also think everything is a bit small, especially at larger resolutions.

Megan — Fri, 08 Mar 2002 00:43:55 +0000

First problem I notice is the fonts - ugly serif and really small. Not nice. Then I see this:

Quote: 800x600+
Millions of Colours
MSIE 5+
An Open Mind

I'm runing at 1152x864 using Opera 6. Seeing this sort of thing just irritates me. I'm not about to switch browsers here..

Okay, I will, just to see if there's anything I'm missing here. The only thing that seems different is the font - stylesheet must not be working in Opera for some reason... This does look nice - I like the picture effect you've used, but I feel like everything should be bigger. Hmmm... I wonder if you could detect screen res and load a different stylesheet depending???

Busy — Thu, 07 Mar 2002 22:32:57 +0000

that picture takes a while to load (115kb), try somewhere like http://www.spinwave.com/crunchers.html to compress it a bit

you need to pad your main table cell, the contents are hard on the edge.
the "realwebgirl.com" at the bottom right of the page is very hard to read.
your style sheets (CSS) only works in IE, you have .,P remove the dot and comma. add a font family into your body or links as NS is showing links as times new roman.
on your picture page only the top link is working in IE, and Opera is adding big spaces between your links so your background image is repeating, only half the links work in Opera (doesnt give the hand cursor and you havent changed it).
most of the links dont work (no cursor/option to click) in your gallery section either in IE or Opera

few teething problems but a really nice flow/feel to it