Sun, 20 Jan 2002 05:20:19 +0000

Cant you just use ".\file.php"

mairving — Mon, 07 Jan 2002 17:49:14 +0000

Oops, I really didn't see the part about sub-domains, which have their own docroot. You could specify the full path to the menu, like so /home/username/public_html/menu.html.

I personally don't use SSI. I prefer just to use includes in PHP.

yabber — Mon, 07 Jan 2002 16:41:53 +0000

but if I

Quote: Leave the .. out of ../ so that it is /

in my menu doesn't make any difference as when the user has navigated to one of my sub-domains the /page.html reads from the document root of the sub-domain means that they get a page not found, unless I duplicate my site in each sub-domain.
SO for now I guess it has to be http://www.....

Mika

mairving — Mon, 07 Jan 2002 16:34:01 +0000

Leave the .. out of ../ so that it is /
Using ../ forces it up one level, using / forces it to read from your document root of the server which is where the index page is.

Brian, as far as where I heard about the difference between using sitename.com/pagename.html as opposed to /pagename.html . , who knows where I read that. It just comes from practice. Using the full path causes the server to first find sitename.com, then index.html. Using /index.html, causes it to only use the path from the server that it is on. Several other factors come into play. One is your cache. If the link is already loaded is in you cache, the speed difference will not be as great.

Megan — Mon, 07 Jan 2002 16:11:32 +0000

You might have to use full URL's just in your includes to make sure everything references properly.

yabber — Mon, 07 Jan 2002 15:54:17 +0000

The problem that I have at the moment is using SSI on all my pages to call 1 menu, and I am also using the same menu in sub-domains, so ../index.html from a sub-domain results in a page not found, as a result I have used http://www.domain.com/ as links for all the pages in my menu.
Is this a good/bad thing ?
Any other Ideas Suggestions ?

Thanks

Mika

Busy — Mon, 07 Jan 2002 04:44:01 +0000

If you use the full path, say on images, the browser actually goes out of your directory/domain and comes back in for each full pathed object listed, but if you only have the image name it knows they are all within your directory.

Brian Farkas — Mon, 07 Jan 2002 03:50:42 +0000

Really? Hmm.. didn't know that. Where did you hear that from? I wouldn't have thought that just a few extra characters of text would have significantly affected page loading at all. I guess you learn something new each day.

Brian

mairving — Mon, 07 Jan 2002 02:02:54 +0000

Quote: Originally posted by Brian Farkas

Neither style, however, slows down page loading any more than the other.

The fastest way is always:
page.html but this only works if you don't use sub-directories.
/page.html is slower but not perceptibly so.
http://www.sitename.com/page.html is quite a bit slower than the above and should only be used in stuff like html emails.

Brian Farkas — Sun, 06 Jan 2002 20:15:27 +0000

As Megan mentioned, it's better to use relative links instead of the entire URL. That way, if someone accesses your site in the form of http://domain.com/ they will not be brought to domain.com when they click a link.

Neither style, however, slows down page loading any more than the other.