<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1016346" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1016346</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
          <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-hosting-and-domain-names/hosting-site#comment-1094734</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;at average 4 gig transfer can hold 500k hits per month.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2001 00:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>vegs</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1094734 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-hosting-and-domain-names/hosting-site#comment-1094729</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I would say you would have plenty of bandwidth.  I have a website which has large pictures and text and last month I averaged a thousand visitors a day and only needed a gig of bandwidth so 4 gig should be plenty ............ but don&#039;t quote me !&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2001 21:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>m1l</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1094729 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-hosting-and-domain-names/hosting-site#comment-1094720</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;It all depends on the type of site you have and the kind of files you have. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For example- each &quot;hit&quot; to your web page uses some bandwidth. If you have a 10 KB web page with 3 8 KB images, you have used 34 KB of bandwidth with that visit. If 100 People visit that page, you have used 3400 KB of bandwidth (~ 34 MB).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This same process repeats for each page they access on your site. However, there is some good news; usually, browsers cache the page data, so when they visit the same page again that probably won&#039;t use up as much bandwidth.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you are offering downloads for music or other large files, then you are going to consume a lot more bandwidth than with just static HTML pages. Hope this made sense!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Brian&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2001 18:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Brian Farkas</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1094720 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-hosting-and-domain-names/hosting-site#comment-1094715</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I there,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would say, from my personal and business experience that most of personal sites, even with galleries on them will eat up probably not more than 1-2GB per month and this seems to be an average.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2001 17:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Enigmatic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1094715 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
