<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1016216" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1016216</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
          <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/serverside-scripting/script-and-html-same-page#comment-1093941</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;If it&#039;s a small page then you&#039;re not going to notice that much of a performance gain from doing your response.write in a block, but it is better, both performance, and readability wise, if you can do a mass response.write. Plus then you&#039;ll be better prepared for .Net &lt;img src=&quot;https://www.webmaster-forums.net/misc/smileys/wink.png&quot; title=&quot;Wink&quot; alt=&quot;Wink&quot; class=&quot;smiley-content&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2001 13:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Peter J. Boettcher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1093941 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
