<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1015266" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1015266</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
          <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-design-and-graphics/web-designers-nightmare#comment-1090970</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;As stated above, 800x600 and 1024x768 are the 2 big resolutions being used...you can almost cut it right down the middle.  Ultra high and ultra low res account for a small slice of the pie and people at these resolutions expect to scroll or squint at web pages.  Its probably best to design for 800x600 width (760 x 400 browser window OR 770 x 418 with margins removed via body tag additions) and design for expansion to 1024x768.  Keep in mind that when expanding using percentages, its a good idea to keep one of the axis constant.  (ie...either expand vertically or horizontally but not both).  It is possible to build a workable page that expands and contracts all the way down to 640x480 but probably not necessary.  I wouldnt be too concerned with resolution that low.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2001 14:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Suchey</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1090970 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-design-and-graphics/web-designers-nightmare#comment-1089826</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Alot of times you can explain this to the client and have them pay the extra bit to design two pages one for 800* one for 1024*&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;then just implement a detect script that sends the user to the site designed for there broswer size.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2001 09:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ghostface</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1089826 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-design-and-graphics/web-designers-nightmare#comment-1088694</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I&#039;m no expert but well over 80% of my visitors use 800 x 600 monitors.....&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2001 21:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>openmind</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1088694 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-design-and-graphics/web-designers-nightmare#comment-1088599</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;These boards usually have the option to allow pictures in sigs or not.  The admins here may have it disabled.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2001 23:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>tmay</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1088599 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-design-and-graphics/web-designers-nightmare#comment-1088537</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Interesting, it will display the gif in a message, but not on my profile. Me thinks I see a crop circle forming in my backyard! AAHHH!!!!!!&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2001 10:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Keegan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1088537 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-design-and-graphics/web-designers-nightmare#comment-1088536</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;The text in the signature field of my current profile is exactly this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;img src=&amp;quot;http://www.kilclinefuneralhome.com/wf_posts/keegan.gif&amp;quot; alt=&amp;quot;&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;bb-image&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;&#039;&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2001 10:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Keegan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1088536 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-design-and-graphics/web-designers-nightmare#comment-1088535</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Hey thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have done a lot of non-profit work, and while most of it has helped me grow over time, speed is what I am about now. Sometimes I will throw hours and hours into something, but more often than not the faster I can do something and not look back, the more right on it is.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Everything I know about computers is self taught, read somewhere, or tried until I wanted to throw the computer through a window.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Learned early on it&#039;s about the tools.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A good tip to anyone stuck on anything about computers should follow at least these three tips.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1 If there is something wrong, it is always, I mean always the simplest thing. (Finding it is the problem) read below for number two.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2 Someone somewhere has had the very same problem, went insane over it, nearly killed someone over it, almost barfed over it, dented a car over it, caused a fight over it, damaged a computer over it, but someone no matter what it is has made a web page about it. (Learn to search) tools, number three.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3 If something does not make sense, something has just frustrated you to no end, always, and I mean always remember that there is a web page with either a software tool you need, or a guide that is indispensable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In closing about my tips section,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;KNOW YOUR FAVORITES!, get cozy with them, update them, and best of all give the webmasters feedback, register to their forums, and post. Its the least we can do.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;K&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;p.s. It is a gif and for some reason I cannot get it to display. I believe it is enclosed correctly with brackets but I will check it based on your suggestion again. Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2001 10:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Keegan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1088535 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Keegan2</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-design-and-graphics/web-designers-nightmare#comment-1088533</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Okay guys. I logon here probably 2-3 times a day reading all the posts and such, and a couple of days ago keegan2 appeared... I just want to say wow... this guy has given out som uch good advice in so little time... just wants to say thanks... I&#039;ve gleamed some good advice from what you&#039;ve said...&lt;br /&gt;
DavidJaymz&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;p.s. if you want the pic in your sig to work you need to add &lt;img /&gt; to your link (But use square brackets)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DavidJaymz&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2001 10:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>davidjaymz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1088533 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-design-and-graphics/web-designers-nightmare#comment-1088493</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Most of this thread has been about html, but I have found with enough work on a particular layout you can show the site off at 640x480, and 1280x1024. Graphics can add to the higher res with a large low opacity bg (Large meaning 1600x1280, usually 9kbs but it cover the higher res.&lt;br /&gt;
A site I made last year has this going on, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edenatlanta.com&quot; class=&quot;bb-url&quot;&gt;edenatlanta.com&lt;/a&gt; It works in 800x600 and 1280x1024, I think it even will do 1600....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That is the hardest part though, making your layout work with the html. Usually takes me about 2 hours to get a manual slice out of photoshop but it kicks holy butt on fireworks imho. I like it pixel by pixel (Thats what she said) hehhehee&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2001 22:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Keegan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1088493 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-design-and-graphics/web-designers-nightmare#comment-1088097</link>
    <description> &lt;blockquote class=&quot;bb-quote-body&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Quote: &lt;em&gt;Originally posted by Megan &lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;I usually do flex width tables, which will work from 640 x 480 to 1024.  They tend to stretch too much at resolutions higher than that, I usually have very few visitors running at such a high res, and I think that most people who use really high resolutions don&#039;t maximize their browsers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My res is 1600x1280.  I use a javascript to set my browsers to 1024x768.  My cousin also has a res of 1600x768, and I don&#039;t beleive he maximizes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just a little FYI.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2001 03:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mark Hensler</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1088097 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
