<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1014965" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1014965</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
          <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/twf-feedback-and-announcements/server-side-scripting-forum#comment-1086513</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I think it should stay consolidated, if it was to be broken up it shouldn&#039;t be done by language/technology (ie. Perl/CF/PHP/ASP etc), otherwise you would end up with 10+ forums just dedicated to server-side languages! I would break it up by Server OS (ie. UNIX/LINUX/Windows/SUN etc), while it&#039;s true many of the languages I listed are OS independant the vast majority are used on specific OS due to ease of use and effeciency.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2001 12:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Peter J. Boettcher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1086513 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/twf-feedback-and-announcements/server-side-scripting-forum#comment-1086484</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;It&#039;s up to Chad.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My opinion is that I think it would be a pain to figure out how to split the posts if we split up the forum.  We would probably end up having to make a &#039;Resevoure&#039; forum that held all the old posts from the combined forums.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2001 00:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mark Hensler</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1086484 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/twf-feedback-and-announcements/server-side-scripting-forum#comment-1086467</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I see your point, but I&#039;m not sure if I agree with it. I would be all for a slightly different forum organization scheme, but that&#039;s not up to me. Mark or Chad, what do you think?&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2001 19:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mjames</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1086467 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/twf-feedback-and-announcements/server-side-scripting-forum#comment-1086458</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;right. my point was that when perl had it&#039;s own forum, it was quite active. now the server side scripting forum is dead in comparison, with only a few posts per day at best. perhaps the reason WHY it is dead is due to the structure of the forum&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2001 18:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1086458 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/twf-feedback-and-announcements/server-side-scripting-forum#comment-1086438</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Hi Andrew,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I believe additional forums would be added and larger ones would be separated only if those larger forums consistently had large amounts of activity. Until that happens, I think things should stay as they are. No one wants a half dozen dead forums.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2001 17:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mjames</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1086438 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
